The economy, job and housing market are the most important issues for the American electorate.

An overwhelming population is experiencing tough economic situations one way or another and there is legitimate concern over the rising deficit as well.

President Barack Obama and Congressional Democrats achievements, work-in-progress including the remedial measures are elaborated for better understanding and fair assessment.

Upon assuming office President Barack Obama and the Congressional Democrats passed the economic stimulus bill worth $787 billion to salvage the economy from ‘Great Depression,’ at that time.

This step was vital for the U.S. and the global economy on the precipitous decline following,

The previous administration’s deficit spending on two simultaneous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,

Facilitating financial market recklessness,

Free market deregulations in finance, health and energy industries,

Widening deficits through financial and auto industry bailouts with no accountability

Allowing Corporations to evade taxes on domestic and overseas earnings with adverse effects on national revenue.

Extending tax cuts for the wealthy – are the few recipes that triggered the economic disaster.

The policies were implemented at U.S. taxpayers and the average Americans colossal expense.

By neglecting the national requirements - prominently the job and housing market deceleration, the infrastructure repair and restoration, education, health, social security, veterans’ health care, small businesses and the American families in general.

President Barack Obama then introduced “The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act” for $787 billion in February 2009.

It comprised -
• $288 billion in tax cuts.
• $224 billion in extended unemployment benefits, education and health care.
• $275 billion for job creation using federal contracts, grants and loans.

The main objective was to invigorate economic and job growth at an estimated 900,000 – 2.3 million jobs.

Further, the stimulus fund was spread over ten years with the first three fiscal years receiving the major allocation.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected the stimulus funds would boost GDP growth by 1.4% - 3.8% at the end of 2009.

GDP growth for Q4, 2009 – 5.6% when including the businesses low inventory replenishment.

Otherwise the growth reported to be 1.8%.

According to (BEA) Bureau of Economic Analysis, Trading economics – Bloomberg – Thank you.

“The current GDP growth is 2.40%, with Growth rate – 1.60%, Inflation rate – 1.20%, Jobless rate – 9.50%, Interest rate – 0.25%.”

A significant increase when compared with the negative GDP growth -6.80% in December 2008.

The economy has moved from the negative to a positive trend with a present annual growth rate at 1.60%.

Beginning 2010, the economic figures in the first and second quarters are very encouraging and attention worthy.

GDP before adjusting for inflation in Q1 (Jan – Mar) 2010 rose to 4.8% and Q2 (Apr – Jun) 2010 – 3.6%.

GDI – Gross domestic income – the individuals, private and public sector combined income reportedly increased by 2.3% annual rate for Q2, 2010 after gaining 4.1% in the first quarter – Q1, 2010.

Corporate profits after an impressive 10.5%increase in Q1, 2010, rose by 4.6% for Q2, 2010 – still maintaining the gain from Q2, 2009.

Similarly the higher earnings by 39 percent in Q2, 2010 is relatively progressive than the 2009 second quarter.

Consumer spending for Q1, 2010 – 1.9% and Q2, 2010 – 2% exceeding the previously expected 1.6% pace for the second quarter.

Wages and salaries for Q1, 2010 increased by $6.5billion from the fourth quarter i.e. Q4, 2009.

Company inventory in Q2, 2010 was 0.65% against 2.64% for Q1, 2010. However, the business capital expenditure on structures, equipment had surpassed the prior projection of 22 percent to 24.9 percent.

Trade gap seemingly grew to $445 billion for Q2, 2010 in excess of the previous estimate at $425.9 billion confirming the import level at 32.4%.

It’s clear from the data that the economy in 2010 is comparatively a vast improvement to 2008.

The modest annual rate 1.60% is attributed to numerous factors:

Despite 39 percent increase in 2010 second quarter corporate earnings, the companies have contracted inventory spending, payrolls and lowered employee wages contributing to sluggish job growth and household income reduction eventually having an impact on the economic stimuli – the consumer spending.

Consumer spending also affected by the lack luster housing and stock market performance with majority households dependent on investment income.

Notwithstanding the ripple effect on the small businesses relying on retail purchases.

In addition the rising imports at 32.4 % suggest the lagging manufacturing industry require substantial private investments to provide the anticipated jobs.

Perhaps, capital gains tax relief might incentivize corporations to promote jobs in the manufacturing and service sector. The consideration could ease the burden on Congress in extending unemployment benefits to the jobless.

Per Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board that oversees spending under American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 available at:

http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/home.aspx - Thank you.

Recovery funded jobs reported by recipients – 749,597 as of June 30, 2010.

“Job calculations are based on the number of hours worked in a quarter and funded under the Recovery Act.”

Evidently, the $787 billion has not been entirely invested in the economy to realize the immediate goals – jobs, housing and stock market appreciation to generate consumer spending and ultimately the desirable GDP growth.

Stimulus fund investment verification:

Tax Benefits:
Allocation - $288 billion
Investment - $223B /77%
Remaining Fund - $ 65B / 23%

Education, Jobless Benefits etc.:
Allocation - $224 billion
Investment - $143B / 64%
Remaining Fund - $ 81B / 36%

Contracts, Grants & Loans:
Allocation - $275 billion
Investment - $139B /51%
Remaining Fund - $136B /51%

President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and the Congressional Democrats have passed the crucial legislations to stimulate the different economic sectors.

Housing Market – Foreclosure moratorium to contain the bleeding and refinancing at affordable payments has saved homeowners from losing their homes. The documentation and eligibility cited as the reasons for the programs’ average success.

Addressing these issues would enormously benefit many homeowners and revive the housing market.

Also, the $8,000 credit to first home buyers enabled the market to rein in on falling home prices nationwide.

Therefore based on the results, extending the moratorium and first homebuyer credits, refinancing options by reviewing the eligibility criteria to include more struggling homeowners could be helpful to the housing sector.

Tax benefits: President Barack Obama and Congressional Democrats have been extremely diligent in this respect.

Tax breaks to 99% represented by average Americans, small businesses, corporations creating or saving employment, payroll taxes, tax exemption to seniors with moderate income $50,000 or less, consumer rebates and credits on home and automobile transactions – proof is in the data for 77% of the allocated stimulus fund has been invested.

The recent $26 billion bill for unemployment benefits extension and the federal aid to cash-strapped states to prevent job losses as well as essential programs termination directly influence consumer spending.

Investments in infrastructure projects such as highways and roads, the electric power grid, dams, bridges, levees, water mains and sewer systems, airport, public transportation system expansion by building new high-speed passenger rail systems were in the job creation proposal.

Although, the target is – 900,000 – 2.3 million jobs, it’s distributed across the economic spectrum ranging from green jobs, infrastructure, manufacturing and service sector to small businesses.

A bulk of it to be absorbed by the private sector contrary to the false propaganda on the alleged government take-over of the free market.

President Barack Obama’s timely intervention in the auto industry attracted criticism from the opposition.

Nonetheless, today the state of Michigan that was worst hit in the economic recession is experiencing job growth in the auto industry due to the Obama administration rescue plan.

Stimulus package has been directed towards saving multitude jobs for the beleaguered local school districts that threatened teachers’ salaries with layoffs and cutbacks,

Federal grants to make education affordable for students - Pell Grants for college education and ‘race to the top’ federal funds for schools across the nation.

Adequate medical coverage for military members and their families and $1 billion for the Veteran’s Administration - which suffered severe cutbacks under President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney that led to the Walter Reed Army Hospital closure at the peak of Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

In an effort to care for the children and seniors - Food programs for low-income Americans, including $150 million to help refill food banks, $100 million in meals programs for seniors, and $100 million for free school lunch programs - all ignored by the former administration.

Deficit management is possible with the troop withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan, constrain defense expenditure, health care costs savings and economic surge producing revenues, besides optimizing GDP growth through exports.

Above all, President Barack Obama and the Democrats legislative successes are phenomenal.

Historic reforms in finance and health care in tandem with bipartisan committee on deficit control deserve recognition.

The economy, jobs and the housing market are the President and the Congressional Democrats’ priority and they continue to explore all options in expediting the economic recovery.

If not for their hard work and determination to improve American lives, the pessimistic view on the economy would have prevailed.

Congratulations! To President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, the Congressional Democrats and the selective Republican members for the milestones reached thus far and the impending legislations to move our great nation forward.

All the more reason to elect the Democrats for a super majority in the House and the Senate, so that President Barack Obama can complete the tasks in every respect, particularly accelerating the job growth, stabilizing the economy and energizing the housing market.

A great future is certain with President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and the Democrats majority in Congress.

Please visit the DNC, DSCC, DCCC and DGA websites for your generous contributions to elect the new and incumbent democrats in November 2010.

Thank you.

The BP Gulf oil spill is a major economic, environmental and now political issue for the White House.

Since the disaster in April 2010, the economic consequences from the ecological damages proved to be unsustainable. Beginning with the distribution of $20 billion compensation from BP to the Gulf coast residents experiencing economic difficulties and the persisting marine life destruction is no longer a territorial concern but a national crisis.

No reason could possibly justify the delay or denial in the monetary disbursements for the Gulf States victims suffering from the cataclysmic industrial negligence.

Making BP accountable for the mishap with the $20 billion package is effective upon the victims actually receiving the payments due to them in the hour of need.

Evidently, the government scientists including the officials’ clarification and BP’s account together do not reflect the reality in damage control nor does it resolve the burgeoning problem.

According to the independent experts, it’s not possible to accurately measure the substantial loss to the ecosystem and the growing economic costs to the fishery, seafood and tourism industry -

For they have been largely affected in the worst environmental catastrophe.

The sprawling oil plumes contaminating the area urgently require non-toxic i.e. pure and natural agents in separating the floating oil residue on the surface.

By using the organic products as the subsidence would clear the water of the harmful toxic substance, while providing food source for the vast oceanic life.

Considering the prolonged, exhaustive and expensive cleaning methods applied unsuccessfully by BP and the government agencies thus far,

The operation could be handed over to the private organizations supplemented with the natives’ assistance from the coastal regions. These companies with the relevant technical expertise and the natives’ extensive knowledge about the vulnerable aquatic life would expedite the cleaning process and sustain the precious habitat.

Although, President Barack Obama is committed to restoring the victims livelihood,

It would enable the White House in monitoring the situation without being directly involved in crisis management.

Further the financial responsibility for the private companies and the natives’ involvement would be entirely on BP. The job losses could be replaced with the private jobs in addition to hiring the local residents in the massive environmental cleanup. The economic benefit would also include the tax earnings from the private sector.

Engaging the private industry has better prospects for immediate results besides addressing the constant criticism against the Obama Presidency on the alleged government takeover of the free market opportunities.

The private sector combined with the local residents’ efforts is guaranteed to bring relief to the Gulf coast economy and the environment.

Recent oil spills threatening life existence is widespread as noted in China, Mumbai, India and the United States with a blatant warning that clean renewable energy from natural sources such as solar, wind, hydropower and biofuels are the only alternatives to preserve the planet for future generations.

In this context, it’s essential to shed light on the emerging bipartisan energy bill - “Cap and Dividends,” by the Republican Senator Susan Collins from Maine and the Washington State Democrat Senator Maria Cantwell.

If both Senators could elaborate on the bill, it would increase public awareness and potentially influence the legislators in passing the bill.

United States and the rest of the world have no choice but to steer away from fossil fuel and nuclear energy by overwhelmingly adapting to the abundant clean renewable energy programs.

Protecting the environment is a collective obligation and the energy legislation would be a national assurance to their respective population.

Please save life by saving our beautiful planet.

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

Pakistan is experiencing the worst humanitarian crisis due to massive flooding, posing tremendous challenges for the government and the victims.

Although, the United States assistance has been substantial in the relief operation, it’s a global responsibility to help the people of Pakistan.

The onus is not on the United States alone, the international aid from all corners of the world is essential to rescue the estimated twenty million displaced population and the families who have lost their loved ones in the natural disaster.

There is an opportunity for all nations across the globe to come forward and extend their support through financial and other humanitarian resources.

Perhaps, The Kingdom of Brunei, Saudi Arabia, EU, the Middle East and developing nations including private donors from different parts of the world could share the financial burden with the United States and humanitarian organizations.

Pakistanis’ plight cannot be ignored as the internal or national problem. The culmination of natural catastrophe and economic conditions have increased the inevitable health risks apart from the potential threats in social, environmental, political and security fronts for the South Asian country.

In the holy month of Ramadan, the people of Pakistan are dealing with the natural calamity and struggling to overcome the enormous tragedy on their shores.

Please respond to Pakistani citizens’ “SOS,” with an outpouring compassion and generosity that is required more than ever.

People of Pakistan also urgently deserve the world society’s contribution in nation building and economic growth to emerge from the burgeoning status quo.

International Humanitarian Agencies such as International Red Cross, American Red Cross, Oxfam, Doctors without Borders including the United Nations’ Relief Organizations are standing by to accept your donations.

You could visit their websites to make any affordable payments.

Organizing concerts for the worthy cause could also expedite the fund raising possibilities in this regard.

Please reach out to the victims to minimize casualties and save precious lives.

Your kindness is much appreciated.

Thank you.

Heartfelt Congratulations! To the LGBT community and Gay rights advocates on the recent victory.

On August 5, 2010 the California federal court Judge Vaughn R. Walker ruled against Proposition 8 that banned same-sex marriage.

The issue had been long contested by the opponents through various avenues - legal, ballot and legislative measures.

Yesterday’s ruling confirms the unconstitutionality surrounding the voter supported Proposition 8 that deprived society’s specific members the equal rights in all matter.

With this verdict, a significant progress has been made thus far.

The debate has evolved into a much better understanding of the prevalent social injustice prompting legislative actions by the Democratic Congress to protect these citizens from discriminatory practices including,

President Barack Obama’s actions extending equivalent benefits to federal employees and gay rights expansion in every possible dimension, not to mention the initiative to repeal ‘Don’t ask don’t tell,’ policy in the military.

There is still a great deal of efforts required in invoking natural empathy, the inherent human quality latent in the contemporary society,

For the civil union continues to be the political choice over legitimacy to formalizing the marital status.

Nevertheless, the gay rights movement has gained impressive momentum through myriad sources and it will soon be triumphant nationally in this regard.

Incremental winnings provide optimism in the targeted goals and the gay members deserve to prevail at every opportunity.

Any society that believes in - “All are created equal in every respect,”

They would unequivocally favor the simple desire for “same-sex,” marriage among their fellow human beings without subjecting them to individual perceptions.

Best Wishes and Good Luck! To the gay activists for more positive outcome not only in this issue but also the ‘don’t ask don’t tell,’ matter.

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

Pakistan has been hit with successive tragedies lately resulting in enormous loss of precious lives.

Earlier, there were significant fatalities from the air crash near Islamabad. While the people were grieving over the aviation mishap, the country is swept with massive flooding and more than 1500 people reportedly lost their lives.

The flooding is expected to worsen with thousands displaced and millions facing life disruptions due to power outages and transportation problems.

Pakistani government appears to have deployed its military for rescue operation. It’s challenging to deal with mass mobilization for any emergency crew. The Pakistani forces are apparently doing their best in saving lives.

In addition, the United States logistic support in this regard expedites the relief effort. The major concerns during natural disasters are the spread of diseases and the populace exodus to the safety zones.

Aid workers involved in minimizing casualties have a daunting task in reaching the victims because of the limited access and air lifting survivors often delays the progress.

It’s a horrendous humanitarian endeavor and the people of Pakistan are courageously enduring the aftermath despite the natural constraints in delivering the urgently required services.

United Nations are presumably engaged in providing the appropriate assistance that would not only alleviate the burden on the local governments but also maximize the restoration capabilities.

The people of Pakistan deserve global attention in the economic and social development sharing the status with numerous developing nations around the world.

As such Pakistan has been held hostage by the terror networks prompting ongoing military intervention and continuous violence through frequent suicide bombings render survival impossible for the peaceful majority within the country.

Any other incidents along with natural calamities exacerbate the situation especially for the millions at the demographic bottom experiencing critical economic condition.

The Pakistani government is faced with eliminating terrorism and rebuilding the country amid unpredictable catastrophes on its shores.

Pakistan is long overdue for a new beginning with peaceful existence now and in the future.

It’s imminent and the governing authorities could enable the onset sooner by prioritizing the citizens’ plight through divestments from excess military expenditure to economy, education and social structure.

In terms of the current crisis, consolidating the resources including the United States and UN contributions towards different humanitarian needs in the grim moment could perhaps yield the desirable outcome.

International Red Cross and other U.N. humanitarian programs might greatly impact the deteriorating environment in containing the rising death toll from the severe floods that has seemingly affected many provinces.

Please rush your affordable and generous donations to the International Red Cross and other recognized U.N. humanitarian agencies to help the people of Pakistan.

We offer our sincere condolences to the victims’ families mourning on the unfortunate events in the past week.

More importantly, there is hope for the struggling population braving the harsh realities as they are not forgotten in the commitment to end human suffering.

On that positive note, wishing strength and optimism to the people of Pakistan in overcoming the multitude difficulties at present.

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

Condolences to the families mourning the loss of life from different tragic events.

The recent train crash in West Bengal, India with reportedly 61 people dead in the accident is regrettable.

In other incidents, terrorism taking toll on human life is the norm in certain parts of the world.

The bomb blasts in July 2010 alone has claimed many innocent lives -

Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran…in July 2010 is worthy of condemnation as often the civilians are the victims in the terror related violence.

Freedom along with social and economic opportunities would substantially deter the terror recruitment among the desolate youth population hired for committing horrendous crime against their fellow humans.

Evidently, the citizens in these regions unanimously favor the divestments from prolonged wars towards social and economic development.

Peaceful resolutions focused on economic progress would enormously benefit everyone involved in the global terrorism era.

Terror networks successfully engage the impoverished segment of the population under the pretext of improving their life and the lack of education among the terror recruits is a huge advantage to them.

Accordingly, the militants and the terror organizations regularly attack schools and the educational institutions to deprive the youth from proper education.

Investments in drones, bombs and sophisticated artillery thus far might have eliminated the crucial targets. However, terrorism never dissipates despite the relentless military intervention due to the underlying hindrances in human existence.

Besides participation in the governance through democratic process, the overwhelming majority in these nations seek basic requirements such as clean drinking water, healthy environment to live in modest conditions enabled by agriculture and industrial growth .

Unless these issues are addressed effectively which is not possible by a dysfunctional government, the terror networks will continue to exist as a parallel governing authority holding the people hostage to their violent agenda.

Empowering people with necessary economic and human rights is the best alternative to the military options that are increasingly alienating the local population from the Western interests.

Perhaps, the nations combating terrorism could consolidate their resources and aim to alleviate the suffering through peaceful means.

Where there’s a will, there’s a way.

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

My sincere apologies to the following individuals for the delay in responding to their request.

Nobel Laureate and Author Toni Morrison (The First African American to win the Nobel Prize for Literature) – Congratulations! On this phenomenal achievement. In addition, thank you for your kind remarks in the Certificate of Appreciation.

Hon. Senator George McGovern (Former Democratic Presidential Candidate)

Renowned Author John Grisham – and,

Last but not the least – The respectable Harry Sarazin – Special Agent FBI (Ret.) – One of the first FBI agents assigned to the Mississippi Burning case.

It’s to acknowledge your call for support to this organization founded by the eminent Chief Trial Counsel, Morris Dees stating that:

SPLC – Southern Poverty Law Center – Fighting Hate, Teaching Tolerance and Seeking Justice.

“The single most effective organization in fighting hate groups in the courtroom and teaching tolerance and acceptance in the classroom.”

The Chief Trial Counsel, Morris Dees’ accomplishments testify his dedication in promoting tolerance and social justice. It’s highly commendable and deserve the necessary aid.

Despite significant progress in this respect, there is still a great requirement to spread the positive attributes of human nature – mutual understanding, respect and unity.

Humanity benefits by treating one another as human beings first prior to any other denomination.

Tolerance comes from natural empathy. Unfortunately, misconception supersedes better knowledge about a particular race, religion or gender and their lifestyle orientation.

For knowledge demands patience, sincere learning and proper application in life.

Mankind easily identify differences than recognizing commonalities among them with or without the realization on the self-inflicted miseries through wars, hate crimes, and social upheavals.

Education focused on appreciation rather than denunciation about people and culture would help the society to embrace uniqueness in the diverse creation.

All are created equal and have the inalienable right to freedom without being subject to any injustice mainly oppression, persecution and other discriminatory practice.

The civil rights attorney Morris Dees’ long journey has witnessed the anomalies in the struggle for fairness.

Nevertheless, the successful outcomes reflect his resolve as well as the commitment towards social equality.

If you wish to extend your support to this organization, please send your donations to:

Southern Poverty Law Center
400 Washington Avenue
P.O.Box 548
Montgomery, AL 36177-9621

Best Wishes for more SPLC triumphs and the humanitarian goal in bringing people together.

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing to confirm the Supreme Court Nominee – Solicitor General Elena Kagan is in process.

Solicitor General Elena Kagan upon confirmation would succeed the retired Supreme Court Justice, John Paul Stevens to the United States Supreme Court.

Notably, the appointment would strengthen the female representation to one-third on the current bench.

While it still remains a minority. it’s a significant social progress made in recent years to the highest court on land.

President Barack Obama’s commitment in this respect is praiseworthy.

Since the hearing commencement, the Solicitor General Elena Kagan has responded patiently and diligently to most if not all of the issues raised by the distinguished panel.

The Solicitor General’s disposition conforms to the previous appointees for similar position.

Therefore, it’s not unprecedented in the Senate confirmation hearing.

Although, departure from such tradition would benefit public confidence in the potential lifetime appointee entrusted with judicial duty on life and death matter.

The Senate members posed many important issues to ascertain the nominee’s position. Some were politically motivated and the majority relevant to the cause.

Solicitor General Elena Kagan’s background and credentials has been under scrutiny from the early introduction to until now.

The Supreme Court nominee is profiled for better understanding and in some instances caricatured to place the aspirant in spotlight depending on the critics’ “ethical” standard.

Solicitor General Elena Kagan stellar academic and career achievements have rightfully earned the recognition leading up to the Supreme Court nomination.

The buzz about the nominee from the beginning was her lack of experience in the capacity as a ‘Judge,’ despite the precedence set by the Supreme Court predecessors, the latest being the former Justice William Rehnquist nominated by the Republican President Ronald Reagan.

During the Senate hearing, the nominee, Elena Kagan had to address diverse issues ranging from:

The executive power, Congressional deference, corporate influence, political activism – a common attribute towards the democratic nominee by the opposition, past incidents linked to,

The military recruitment on college campus including clarification on personal statements and memos to determine adaptability to the existing judicial view.

Solicitor General Elena Kagan maintained throughout the session that she would strictly adhere to the Constitutional law and not attempt to interpret it differently for political or any other reason.

Further, the Solicitor General elaborated on personal humility and pledged to respect the precedential settings on historic hearings notwithstanding the Supreme Court recent ruling safeguarding the second amendment.

In addition, some Senate members sought assurance from the nominee on the denial of Habeas Corpus to detained terror suspects apprehended from civil or combat environment.

The nominee in agreement with “battlefield law, including indefinite detention without a trial, could apply outside of traditional battlefields.”

International law was extensively discussed against the Constitutional law to establish the nominee’s priority pertaining to the academic period as the “Dean at Harvard Law School.”

In other controversial social issues such as abortion, gay military personnel and the “Don’t ask, don’t tell,” policy, the Solicitor General confirmed the published views.

Protecting women’s health and highlighting the drawbacks from depriving the gay members to serve the nation on equal basis.

However, in the related subjects the nominee Elena Kagan reportedly stated the following:

Source: Wikipedia.org – Elena Kagan

“ 1. From 1995 to 1999, Kagan served as President Bill Clinton’s Associate White House Counsel and Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council.

While serving in that position, Kagan co-authored a May 13, 1997 memo to the President urging him to support a ban on late-term abortions stating that, “We recommend that you endorse the Daschle amendment in order to sustain your credibility on HR 1122 and prevent Congress from overriding your veto.”

2. In 1996, she wrote an article in the University of Chicago Law Review entitled, “Private Speech, Public Purpose:

The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine.” Kagan argued that government has the right, even considering the First Amendment, to restrict free speech, when the government believes the speech is “harmful”, as long as the restriction is done with good intentions.

3. During her solicitor general confirmation hearing, she said that “there is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage.”

Also during her solicitor general confirmation, Kagan was asked about the Defense of Marriage Act, under which states don’t have to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. She said she would defend the act.”

In due fairness to the nominee’s statements, the approach to defend the constitution is a primary judicial responsibility.

At the same time, if exercising empathy in the decision-making is characterized as ‘social activism,’ then similar considerations to the authorities in the executive and legislative branches not barring the corporations exceed the judicial power granted within the confines of the law.

Unfortunately, it’s a growing trend hindering justice particularly on ethical misconduct in the democratic system.

Again, the Solicitor General perceptions on the basic human rights – women’s health, freedom of expression superseding the second amendment in the Bill of Rights, and gay rights is lacking in candor consequentially the clarity on the fundamental law that -

“All are created equal and hence qualify for the equal application of law.”

Social injustice based on race, religion, sexual orientation, gender discrimination, economic status…are explicitly prevalent given the human progress in other tangible fields.

The political, economic and religious institutions intrusion in justice has the ‘average’ human life hanging in balance with the hope that justice is served by taking into account,

Obedience to the law as well as the facts and evidences authenticated by the conscionable action to be impartial.

Solicitor General Elena Kagan is regarded for her intellect, consensus building, hard work and thoughtfulness, the valuable assets that would not only contribute to the enriched Supreme Court representation, but also empower the nation’s highest court with additional perspective.

If confirmed, Solicitor General Elena Kagan would have the opportunity to be a superb Supreme Court Justice.

Best Wishes to the Solicitor General Elena Kagan in all her endeavors.

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

The organization dedicated to helping children with disabilities made the following plea and requested the U.S. Senators from both sides of the aisle to consider reviving the bill and approve the federal Medicaid funding to the states.

One cannot ignore the urgency on this important measure.

Hopefully the GOP Senators would heed to the call for assistance from the most vulnerable members in the society, the children and pass the legislation on humanitarian grounds, if not as a constitutional responsibility.

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

———————————————————————————————-

Fri, June 25, 2010 12:34:38 PM
URGENT: Tell your Senators to do the right thing

From: “Katy Beh Neas, Easter Seals”

Easter Seals: Creating life-changing solutions so that people with disabilities can live, learn work and play.

Dear Padmini,

Vital health care services for people with disabilities are at stake.

Urge your Senators to do the right thing for people with disabilities by passing the Medicaid funding extension.

Last night, the Senate was just three votes short of passing critical Medicaid support for people with disabilities.

If the Senate does not approve additional federal Medicaid funding to the states, they will be forced to cut benefits and services for people with disabilities and chronic illnesses.

We came so close last night. Every message from Easter Seals supporters like you will make a difference when the Senate takes this up again in the next few days.

Act now! Urge your Senators to protect people with disabilities by voting to extend this enhanced federal Medicaid funding!

Medicaid is a lifeline for children and adults with disabilities. Because of the health care they get through the program, they are able to be successful in school, keep a job and live independent lives.

Thanks to Medicaid, a child with autism can get the speech therapy he needs, a teenager with spina bifida can get the wheelchair she needs to use to get around school, and an older person living with a chronic illness can see his doctor.

Medicaid exists to help people who can’t otherwise afford it, pay for critical services like these.

But state budgets have been squeezed by this recession. With less and less tax revenue coming in, they’re facing the prospect of devastating cutbacks.

They need help filling the gaps and keeping important programs afloat.

They’re counting on support from Washington.

The federal government has always shared the financial responsibility for Medicaid.

With so many people in need and the states so strapped for cash, this is the moment for the Senate to step up with additional funding.

When enough of their constituents weigh in, elected officials listen.

That’s why we can’t let Senators cast their vote again without hearing our voices.

But it has to happen fast.

Write your Senators and let your opinion be heard before it’s too late.

I really appreciate your help on this critically important issue.

Dedicated Easter Seals supporters like you are the difference between winning and losing these legislative battles.

Thanks again,

Sincerely,
Katy Beh Neas
Vice President, Government Affairs

Share on Facebook, Share on Twitter
________________________________________

I bear the ‘Almighty God,’ witness to the topic presentation.

Recently, there was a personal setback with a small claims complaint filed by a former tenant, who falsely stated not having received the rental security deposit on the rental property for the period May 2008 through July 2009.

The tenant and his spouse - Timothy Brook and Lucy Brook, had newly arrived from the United Kingdom with no credit history in the United States and leased the referenced property in the claim along with a commitment to purchase their own home at the end of the twelve-month period. Accordingly, it was unanimously agreed at that time to assess the individual status on both sides in a year.

During that period, all requests for any repairs were attended with new replacements under their supervision and utmost satisfaction, including the regular light bulbs changed six months after them settling in the house.

Further, a written consensus was reached to resolve any disputes by an arbitrator rather than lawsuits through attorneys or small claims court system and aim for amicable settlement avoiding litigation costs for both parties.

Unfortunately, this agreement was breached by the tenants who hired an attorney after their voluntary decision to vacate the property, despite my email request on June 3, 2009 about lease renewal for which there was no response.

The attorney sent an inflammatory letter stating that,

“Comply with my clients’ demands on any issues. If not, do so at your peril.”

All records are maintained up until now.

Subsequently, the tenants moved out of the property and the refund check for the rental security deposit was sent promptly. The tenants cashed it in the same month, i.e. July 2009, having acknowledged the adjustments and the payment. Receipts for regular cleaning costs and minor repairs were shared with the tenant. It was all accepted with no objection and the matter was settled in July 2009.

Approximately five months after vacating the house and cashing the refund deposit evidenced by a bank transaction showing check details and the encashment date by the party, a small claims judgment was mailed to my address indicating the amount to be paid against the complaint.

Following that, I filed a motion to vacate the judgment. It went drastically wrong due to the manner the hearing was held by the Commissioner Steven Yep, Santa Clara County, Small Claims Division, and the presiding authority on this case.

The Plaintiff arrived without the witness quoted as a “close friend,” - Simon Eldridge, to confirm the alleged ‘Proof of Service.’

When I raised the question about the witness’ absence with the Plaintiff before the hearing, he paid no attention and walked away.

Instead, the plaintiff delivered a letter that was not shared with me during the documents exchange prior to the hearing and the details were not disclosed.

The Commissioner mentioned that the letter was a note from the witness stating – “the witness could not be at the hearing because of an office meeting.”

Further, the Commissioner said that “he was satisfied with the witness statement by proxy,” alleging the service date and time.

NB: The witness statement was not an affidavit but an ordinary note, a copy that was later obtained.

Most importantly, the witness was not a third party i.e. a Professional Process Server or Sheriff hired to serve the summons with a genuine concern for legal consequences.

Even though, it’s permissible by law to have a person 18 years or above for this purpose, the conflict of interest and the convenience having a close friend to cooperate is easily available in this respect.

The Commissioner then looked at me and asked the specific questions, which he did not consider it necessary to pose to the Plaintiff at the beginning of the hearing:

Do you realize that you are under oath?

To that, I said – Yes, your honor.

Did you take the oath?

I replied. Yes, your honor.

Then he turned to the clerk and verified with her:

Did she really take the oath?

For, he did not believe me in spite of my repeated assurance.

The clerk responded – Yes, she did.

Essentially, the substantive evidence that I provided was set aside against the witness and the plaintiff’s verbal statements that was not only contradictory to their earlier versions, but also failed to support their fraudulent claim.

The inconsistency in the Plaintiff and his witness positions throughout the process were ignored by the judicial authorities, even though it inconclusively proved the fact that the witness or the server never visited the property and the documents were not delivered or served by him for the hearing.

A perjury was committed by the witness and the plaintiff in the wrongful judgment enabling the Plaintiff to game the system with the inherent flaws in the judgment award.

This is just a preview of the hearings that took place with a conspicuous bias whereby the presiding Commissioner Steven Yep became the attorney to the other party, instead of being objective and diligently applying the law on equal and fair basis to both parties.

In the appeal, the Judge Gregory H. Ward at the Superior Court, Santa Clara County chose to disregard the law entirely, in lieu of the witness or the server admission during the appeal on 06/04/10 on the failure to “specify the contents thereof,” required per Code of Civil Procedure 415.20(a) and (b).

Likewise, The SC-104, “Proof of Service,” filed by the Plaintiff’s witness confirms that the copies of documents allegedly served on 09/29/09 were not mailed per Code of Civil Procedure 415.20(a) and (b), apart from other Civil Code requirements being not met by the server representing the Plaintiff.

Besides, the small claims complaint filed under false premise by the Plaintiff whereby,

The Plaintiff denied receiving the rental security deposit, when the refund check was cashed by the Plaintiff on 07/27/09 – evidence was enclosed for court reference.

Similarly, the Plaintiff’s erroneous and unsubstantiated claim comprise moving expenses without any receipts for the itemized charges that does not even add up to the total amount presented in the declaration under penalty of perjury.

“Per Plaintiff’s declaration signed under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Moving expenses - $754.78

Van rental - $73.92

Petrol - $25.00 ( It’s noteworthy that the plaintiff charging the weekly gas amount for shifting within the neighborhood, i.e. less than half a mile.)

Moving boxes - $34.86

Cleaning - $276.00 – (The property owner is being charged for cleaning up the tenants’ mess during their rental period).”

The itemized expense adds up to $409.78 with no receipts and the remaining $345.00 has no explanation or receipts for it.

Again, the amount fraudulently claimed for vacating the property on their volition, regardless of the email request about lease renewal (supported by evidence).

None of these crucial facts and evidences was taken into consideration, thereby awarding the Plaintiff for the felony.

The Judges involved in the case are judged and evaluated by the public for dereliction of duty reflected in their shortsighted decisions affecting and ruining thousands of lives.

Thank you.

Padmini Arhant

—————————————————————————————–

Source: http://www.courthouseforum.com/forums/evaluationtrial.php

Commissioner Steven Yep

All comments are the opinions of the survey respondents.

“Commissioner Yep is a terrible judge.

I have witnessed his conduct in the courtroom on more than one instance. He treats pro se defendants in probably the worst manner for infractions and misdemeanors that are brought before him.

I had a case, which I fought as a pro se, and was tossed out on my behind. It was so bad that I asked a pro temp to hear my case, and won my case.

The fact that I won really doesn’t matter… it’s that the pro temp LISTENED to the argument and heard both sides fully before rendering a decision.

I never had that chance in Commissioner Yep’s court.

I urge anyone who has this guy for a judge to get a preemptory challenge and write to both Judge Danner and the state Commission for judicial independence to get rid of this guy. 2007-02-07

Negative/Critical - View Survey - Grade - D(0.81)

Part I. ABA Guidelines ABA Guideline 5-1. Legal Ability.

a. Having legal reasoning ability. D (1.00)

b. Having knowledge of substantive law. F (0.00)

c. Having knowledge of rules of procedure and evidence. D (1.00)

d. Keeping current on developments in law, procedure, and evidence. C (2.00)

ABA Guideline 5-2. Integrity and Impartiality.

a. Avoiding impropriety and the appearance of impropriety. F (0.00)

b. Treating all people with dignity and respect. C (2.00)

c. Having an absence of favor or disfavor toward anyone, including but not limited to favor or disfavor based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status. F (0.00)

d. Acting fairly by giving people individual consideration. F (0.00)

e. Considering both sides of an argument before rendering a decision. F (0.00)

f. Basing decisions on the law and the facts without regard to the identity of the parties or counsel, and with an open mind in considering all issues. F (0.00)

g. Having ability to make difficult or unpopular decisions. F (0.00) ”
————————————————————————————————–

2. Survey Results for Judge Gregory H. Ward 1

All grades/scores and comments are the opinions of the survey respondent.

Click Here to see Individual Surveys

Overall: 2
D(0.78) out of 11 surveys
Comments (9)

Respondents Approve Monthly View Daily View

Do you approve of this judge’s overall performance? Yes: 0 No: 11

Part I. ABA Guidelines

ABA Guideline 5-1. Legal Ability.

a. Having legal reasoning ability. C- (1.57)

b. Having knowledge of substantive law. C- (1.57)

c. Having knowledge of rules of procedure and evidence. C (2.17)

d. Keeping current on developments in law, procedure, and evidence. D+ (1.25)

ABA Guideline 5-2. Integrity and Impartiality.

a. Avoiding impropriety and the appearance of impropriety. F (0.00)

b. Treating all people with dignity and respect - D (0.75)

c. Having an absence of favor or disfavor toward anyone, including but not limited to favor or disfavor based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status - F (0.12)

d. Acting fairly by giving people individual consideration - F (0.25)

e. Considering both sides of an argument before rendering a decision - D (0.57)

f. Basing decisions on the law and the facts without regard to the identity of the parties or counsel, and with an open mind in considering all issues - F (0.12)

g. Having ability to make difficult or unpopular decisions - F (0.00)

Judge Gregory H. Ward

All comments are the opinions of the survey respondents.

1. Biased Judge Remarkably goes against jury verdicts Case Study–Pfizer (IP)Trade Secrets–astonishing reversal of jury’s unanimous verdict 2010-01-27
View Survey - Negative/Critical - D(0.71)

2. Discounts Jury in jury trials–a complete disrespect for the JURY SYSTEM Very, very favorable to Big Business Should not be on the bench Has other agendas 2010-01-27
View Survey Negative/Critical - D(1.00)

3. Very emotional, unpredictable. Favors defendants to a fault. Believes that he is the law. You don’t need a jury with this judge–he ignores jury decisions. 2009-12-29
View Survey - Negative/Critical - D-(0.52)

4. Most biased judge in California. Strongly favors business. Very emotional. 2009-12-29
View Survey - Negative/Critical - D(0.74)

5. Should be removed from the bench. 2009-12-29
View Survey - Not Classified - (F-1.00)\

6. Very Biased. No respect for decisions by jury. 2009-12-29
View Survey - Negative/Critical - (F-1.00)

7. He totally disregarded the jury verdict. 2009-12-29
View Survey - Not Classified - D(0.78)

8. This judge is totally out of control, egocentric, & emotional.

He has complete disrespect for jury decisions.

He is clearly very emotional and biased toward big business.

Look at his ratings.

In fact, look at his record when serving in DOJ–he effectively was fired because of emotional instability.

Most recent cases: Apple (2008). Pfizer(2008) — he overturned a unanimous jury verdict, and ignored Pfizer’s management prevarications which came to light in the $2.38 billion Pharmacia settlement. 2009-12-29
View Survey Negative/Critical - D(1.00)

9. Example of his reasoning; petitioner had good reason to file as there were changes in circumstances, dad exercised only 12% timeshare, not the 20% of record, dad’s income rose from 285k to 800k.

BUT child support met the kid’s needs and retroactive support would only be a windfall to mother.

The law mandates an increase in support when the timeshare lowers as support must be commensurate with timeshare, so even if dad had no increase in income, lowering dad’s timeshare mandated an increase in support of some amount.

Christ, I didn’t even go to law school and I can reason that one out. More reasoning; ignored argument for hearing on equitable grounds, said FC 2122 does not apply to setting aside a dismissal but CCP 473 does, ignoring the fact that blackmail and duress (not good cause under CCP 473) had been used both to get a settlement and to force a dismissal, ie duress used to deny access to the courts by one party.

Sanctions: awarded 285k in sanctions against unemployed mother to be paid to multimillionaire dad who had used the blackmail and threats to keep mother out of court. 2009-11-27
View Survey - Negative/Critical - D(1.00).”

Next Page »