Syria – Geneva II Conference Failure To End Terrorism Setback for Terror Sponsors
January 31, 2014
By Padmini Arhant
Geneva II conference produced no tangible results with deadlock on key issues especially in terminating terrorism due to United States resumption of arms supply to al-Qaeda and al-Nusra front terror networks in Syria.
The recent secret congressional vote and administration approval to extend support to terrorists groups discarded ill consequences including setbacks on Geneva II negotiations clarifying the lack of commitment to save lives and contain humanitarian disaster.
Geneva II meeting barred real political opposition from Syria and instead invited terror sponsors organized team with no affiliation to Syrian interests considering the members were located overseas and hired to represent hegemony agenda for regime change and transitional government in Syria.
The proposal shows no concern for aftermath leaving Syria and nations behind the illegal invasion exposed to vulnerability with 25,000 and more terror operatives recruited in the United States led proxy war.
Furthermore, the sources arming, funding and training mercenaries have invited upon them and coalition insurmountable problems and their desire to maintain status quo contributes to even greater challenges ahead with significant impact.
The various terror factions goals not necessarily favorable to United States and partners despite the latter being financiers as well as providers of lethal and non-lethal items.
Among them Saudi intelligence chief Bandar Bin Sultan directed extremists plan could unravel aspirations and repeat events for United States and alliance similar to incident in Benghazi, Libya.
United States and other western powers – Britain, Israel and France also face political backlash from war fatigued electorate and further economic woes in the dire economy upon pursuing terror deployment in Syria and reluctance to end conflict.
As for regional participants – Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and Jordan not excluding others lending any form of assistance to terrorism share dismal future with terror tidal wave turning on them.
Geneva II peace talks could have been constructive rather than obstructive posing illegitimate demands and indulgence in fomenting violence.
The opportunity to implement peace accord beginning with ceasefire and arms embargo for humanitarian relief was wasted confirming insincerity and lack of credibility to deliver positive outcome.
Nonetheless, the victims in Syria having endured tremendous atrocities from foreign instigated terror would overcome misery exemplifying resilience and allegiance to Syrian sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Wishing Syrian population and leaderships renewed vigor and vitality in rebuilding the nation.
Peace to Syria!
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Ukraine – Political Unrest At Foreign Powers Behest Threatens National Peace And Stability
January 30, 2014
By Padmini Arhant
Ukraine internal unrest at external forces viz. EU and United States behest is based on regime change strategy using agents projected as the so-called opposition evidently appointed to serve foreign interests in national detriment.
The economic decision to postpone trade deal with EU last November has led to EU and United States initiated protests disrupting civil services and operation through occupation of government buildings and ministries justifying irrationality as means to voice dissent.
The administration under Ukraine President Victor Yanukovych recent concessions –such as eliminating anti-protests law with majority approval in Parliament, amnesty to detainees arrested during anti-government rally followed by Prime Minister Mykola Azarov resignation to appease opposition has not ended EU and United States sponsored political mess.
Political opponents facilitating EU and US intervention in Ukraine affairs could not possibly represent the nation otherwise they would not prolong agitation against government and reject several opportunities for peaceful resolution.
The opposing leaders have presented no viable solutions thus far except for echoing EU and United States demand – calling President Yanukovych to step down from office ignoring vulnerability in leading the country towards political chaos over commerce ties with EU that is yet to prove legitimacy and capability in resolving myriad economic woes confronting the Union.
Ukraine government prioritizing immediate economic requirements and accordingly implementing suitable measures deserves due consideration and support from all sides pledged to Ukraine progress. Again they could seek any clarifications in government policy through constructive discourse in national assembly.
Nonetheless the citizens in Ukraine exercising discernment is critical and allowing disingenuous groups to mislead the nation with foreign officials from United States and EU addressing the mass in public square directly undermines sovereignty.
The reversal of these events in Washington DC or Berlin would not be entertained by neither political systems.
Certain entities in United States Congress and administration hailing Ukraine Parliament action in repealing anti-protests law and blaming government for current standoff with favorite proposal i.e. economic sanctions is paradoxical to little or no tolerance exhibited by them towards Occupy Wall Street peaceful gathering in Zuccoti park, New York City and across the country.
The authorization for dispersing Occupy Wall Street crowd involved massive police force with water cannons, tasers and many arrests notwithstanding some even enlisted in FBI watch list to monitor activity.
Similarly the non-violent demonstration during NATO summit in Chicago May 2012 received police aggression with several wounded and apprehended for sharing their concerns on NATO crimes against humanity.
Likewise EU economic austerity triggered public grievance in London, Berlin, Spain, Greece and Italy…was condemned and contained with strict enforcement of law to prevent recurrence.
More relevantly, the NSA and international network surveillance act under the pretext of national security predominantly engaged in proactive deterrence of potential domestic and global uprising against status quo.
Considering EU and United States authorities reaction to general discontentment in respective domains,
The Ukrainian leadership steps to restore calm and civility despite opposition leaders obstinacy to maintain obstruction of law and order confirm credibility in providing fair governance.
Furthermore the situation highlights the distinction between genuine and false commitment to national service.
The ongoing stalemate in Ukraine is unnecessary and EU fomenting crisis rather than respecting democratically elected government response to refrain from signing the Association Agreement with EU defines the characteristics and purpose behind EU existence.
The peace loving people in Ukraine society coming forward to national cause prohibiting foreign interference and declining to participate in counterproductive anti-government campaign would exemplify Ukrainian patriotism to protect independent identity and solemn self-determination rights on all matter.
Ukraine opposition and misguided supporters extending gridlock with government exacerbate economic conditions and instead accepting dialogue to sort out differences would be effective in saving the nation from turmoil.
Hence all parties bear responsibility to rescue Ukraine from foreign instigated political disturbance.
Best Wishes to Ukraine citizens and leaderships in overcoming challenges in all frontiers.
Peace to Ukraine!
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Syria – Geneva Talks Failure Would Confirm UN, United States And Alliance Dismal Future
January 26, 2014
By Padmini Arhant
The ongoing so-called peace conference in Geneva with UN interlocutor Lakhdar Brahimi on Syria appears to be nothing more than catharsis to once again mislead the world that terror sponsors viz. the United States, Britain, France, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey…are justified in prolonging the proxy war despite death toll exceeding 100,000 and estimated 4.5 million refugees is the result of foreign invasion.
Considering there is no desire for peace among the western powers and allies behind the illegal intervention recruiting terror networks al-Qaeda and al-Nusra front to carry out genocide not to mention cannibalism and use of chemical weapons against people in Syria,
The Geneva meeting having prohibited genuine political opposition in Syria from participation at United States and alliance behest insists on beguiling Syrian and global citizens with pseudo representation known as Syrian National Council (SNC) essentially serving hegemony interests to evade critical decisions such as immediate ceasefire and unconditional withdrawal of mercenaries and death squads ending the three year old conflict.
The western appointed UN mediator Lakhdar Brahimi admission during press interaction that certainty is a rare commodity in UN initiated peace forums is ominous sign for United Nations and UNSC set up to foment and escalate rather than resolve international crises.
UN poised as international body is yet to demonstrate prudence and trustworthiness in global affairs and ingenuity deficiency could be attributed to UNSC key permanent members deliberate misuse of authority like veto powers exacerbating human suffering at every opportunity.
Syrian warfare has consumed scores of innocent lives and ruined millions of citizens with generational impact.
The terror organizers especially United States, Israel, Britain and France proudly claiming to be democracies befitting emulation regard the obsolete and self-destructive imperial aspirations as entitlement.
Similarly their partners Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey willingness to remain servile only to be disposed after being used refuse to learn from the past and present developments leading to disastrous experience hurting the source and facilitators denying them any chance of revival from self-inflicted quagmire.
The western governments authorized terrorism in Syria in semblance with relentless violence in Iraq following United States, Britain and NATO aggression in that country profoundly debilitated UN credibility and major powers economic growth respectively given the exhaustive means proved counterproductive.
Geneva summit focus on terminating terrorism as priority enforcing embargo on arms supply and monetary funding to terrorists on the ground would clarify United States, Russia and other participants’ real intentions and commitment to peace.
As for the unreasonable demands from SNC at United States and coalition order on prisoners release when terrorists atrocities include several abductions of citizens across the spectrum holding them hostage in the burgeoning warfare further indicative of the integrity or the lack thereof in the United States maneuvered UN role to derail positive outcome.
With respect to SNC concern over humanitarian relief specifically in Homs while ignoring the rest of the war ravaged neighborhoods in Syria reveals the western forces exploitation of human plight to suit terror agenda.
Human mind blocked from exploring viable options like peaceful resolutions and instead determined to pursue catastrophe as only preference pose greater challenges for those engaged in self-detrimental cause expediting imminent dissolution of anything and everything associated with irrationality.
Geneva II gathering is a unique moment for all sides to maximize potential to arrive at consensus in bringing the foreign led terrorism to conclusion.
Any failure in this context would confirm establishments dissipation and dismal future for nations complicit in the preventable self-defeating mission.
Best Wishes to Syrian delegation and alike in infusing reason and wisdom transforming the event purposeful to save humanity at large.
Peace to Syria!
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Syria – Geneva II Conference in Switzerland
January 24, 2014
By Padmini Arhant
The peace talks on Syria held earlier in Montreux and now in Geneva, Switzerland are not an occasion for terror sponsors and their representatives to challenge the prospects of positive outcome.
In fact, the conference focus on real issues such as mounting death toll, refugee problems and spill over effects in neighboring states exacerbating human suffering would be impetus for immediate arms embargo on nations providing weapons to al-Qaeda and al-Nusra front terror networks behind massacres in Syria.
The meeting directing attention towards sincere commitment to peace with unconditional withdrawal of mercenaries and terror operatives is imperative to save lives and alleviate humanitarian plight inflicted upon victims in the war torn country.
As for the so-called opposition i.e. Syrian National Coalition echoing United States and regional allies sentiments seeking regime change and transitional government in Syria prove lack of credibility considering Syrian people unanimous rejection of the group and their agenda.
The demand for removal of legitimate government and leadership from power at the Geneva meeting clarifies real intentions to sabotage peace rather than initiate agreement to end conflict without delay.
United States and others including UN bear responsibility in arriving at consensus to terminate terrorism causing bloodshed in Syria.
Syria’s compliance in chemical weapons disarmament to complete satisfaction of UN, United States and Israel…appointed Organization for Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) despite enduring five chemical attacks from U.S. and alliance recruited terrorists set example for the latter to renounce WMD and meet their obligation to mankind.
The chief proponents and facilitators of proxy war in Syria spreading violence across the country show no concern for their actions adversely affecting innocent citizens at national and regional level.
The genocide could no longer continue and participants in the current Geneva summit have opportunity to demonstrate legitimacy in declaring ceasefire and seal the deal with monetary compensation for rebuilding Syria besides honoring Syrian citizens self-determination rights and national sovereignty.
Any outcome other than bringing the Syrian warfare to conclusion would be counterproductive and Geneva event unable to deliver peace treaty could lead to dissolution of UN as an international body notwithstanding serious repercussions for those nations involved in impediments to peaceful resolution.
The brutal attacks not barring cannibalism reflective of the sources funding and arming militants in the merciless operation depict respective nations in bad light due to complacency from society.
The terror organizers unwillingness to relent to peace reviving primitive practices in modern age throughout Syrian turmoil reveals unsavory characteristics inevitably harming the origin in accordance with natural law.
Hence, all sides are urged to prioritize human costs over vested interests since civilians are targeted in the foreign invasion lasting more than three years.
In implementing peace adopting rational means benefit entire region unlike the disastrous pursuits resulting in self-destruction.
Hopefully much anticipated Geneva II accord would be fruitful for Syria and humanity at large.
Best Wishes to Syrian delegation and counterparts in accomplishment of peaceful solution to unnecessary unrest in Syria.
Peace to Syria!
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
CAR – France Illegal Invasion Along With AU And UN Intervention Exacerbate Crises
January 18, 2014
By Padmini Arhant
The unnecessary communal clashes between Muslims and Christians in Central African Republic has provided false pretexts for former colonial power France to invade the nation enriched in mineral resources with UNSC authorizing African Union and UN troops presence in the war torn country.
Since France illegal intervention in Central African Republic on December 5, 2013 similar to operation in West African Mali and North African Libya in 2012 and 2011 respectively, the situation in foreign powers invaded states has deteriorated contributing to humanitarian crises and political turmoil.
Yet the western proposal to deploy more military personnel continues with EU now considering sending 1000 forces to Central African Republic to foment further violence.
The imperial agenda to militarize African continent claiming to restore law and order proved catastrophic at national and regional level notwithstanding destabilization justified as democratic means creating chaos and confusion wherever and whenever possible.
Central African Republic in semblance with neighboring states has invited problems prompting foreign interference rather than seeking reconciliation within setting aside political and religious differences in entire population interest.
The Seleka fighters having ousted former President Francois Bozize and President Michel Djotodia recent resignation evidently promote colonial aspirations declaring CAR – failed state in the inability to end externalized internal conflict.
Any nation dealing with bloodshed from sectarianism and ethnic confrontations need to prohibit weapons supply to rebels, militias and terror networks while adopting non-violence strategy for resolution with legitimate opposition unlike foreign backed disingenuous representation.
The doctrine to settle disputes among tribes, minority and majority segments with foreign aggression involving military outfits and air raids designed to favor prominent powers defense industry vying to escalate tensions in war ravaged nations through constant flow of arms and ammunitions to all sides in the form of generous military aid.
Central African Republic Parliament preparing to elect transitional leadership exercising diligence in choosing interim government pledged to national unity could be instrumental in averting foreign occupation.
The prolonged combat attributed to rising death toll and massive displacement of people fleeing villages and towns in the ongoing unrest.
The trend to subjugate nations cares less about civilian casualties and human suffering resulting from foreign intrusion espousing dominance for unlimited access to natural endowments.
Central African Republic infighting obviously facilitates foreign expansionism leading to surrender of sovereignty.
Instead members from Muslim, Christian and other denominations recognition of national strength remaining in solidarity and accordingly unanimous agreement to disavow hostility amongst them could be the preliminary step towards saving lives that in return would guarantee peace and stability.
The political system demonstrating sincere commitment to citizens’ safety and improving economic conditions utilizing national wealth could deter domestic and foreign threats to topple governments engaged in positive development.
Corruption being integral part of dysfunctional political performance, earnest measures introducing transparency and accountability without exception is fundamental to initiate and implement reforms across the spectrum.
Again political disturbance often emanating from parallel powers quest for global control could be thwarted identifying elements responsible for disruption and appropriate approach to prevent precedence in the near future.
The people in North Central African country – CAR deserve peaceful existence with national potential to alleviate poverty, hunger and various economic as well as social woes that are self-inflicted allowing foreign imposition of rules undermining independent status.
Best Wishes to Central African Republic in overcoming challenges with unified resolve and acceptance of national diversity as an asset not liability in republic empowerment.
Peace and Prosperity to Central African Republic!
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Cambodia – Garment Workers Strike Receives Government Violent Response
January 17, 2014
By Padmini Arhant
The Cambodian garment and shoe factory workers strike for minimum wage increase met with government violent crackdown resulting in peaceful protesters deaths and charges against political opposition in the country.
The Cambodian Labor Ministry offer to raise minimum wage from $80 to $100 per month while the labor force seeking $160 monthly payment in the $5 billion industry confirms exploitation – the common practice worldwide.
Corporations and government obviously do not share profits among employees especially those at the bottom of income hierarchy. The global poverty and economic inequality largely attributed to poor employment conditions and below normal earnings with disproportionate allocation to powerful entities in political and business enterprise.
Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen led government hardline approach against national work force demonstrators on this issue is counterproductive.
The authorities could instead address high inflation along side improving job situation with fair and reasonable remuneration, health care provisions and other benefits for workers behind profitable trade boosting national revenue.
Major multinational companies and designer outlets using Cambodia and many developing nations as manufacturing base also bear responsibility in adopting policies with decent wages for factory workers and members in the service sector.
The government response to curb public rally in addition to political indictment of leaders in National Rescue Party contributes to unrest flaring instability.
Moreover such disposition reveals government lack of commitment to economic growth evident in denying citizens request for affordable living despite enormous returns from apparel and accessories exports abroad.
International consumers effort and direct support to workers in Cambodia and elsewhere with similar experience could deliver positive outcome.
In globalized economy, collective action urging private and public sector to comply with labor and environment laws critical to change status quo alleviating ordinary citizens plight.
Cambodian leaderships peaceful negotiations with protesters, unions and activists including political rivals could perhaps lead to resolutions conforming to better salary and income disbursements essential to narrow the gap between haves and have-nots in society.
Wishing Cambodian citizens success in equitable system establishment facilitating mainstream access to prosperity.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Bangladesh – Political Crises Resolution
January 5, 2014
By Padmini Arhant
The political unrest in the South Asian country, Bangladesh amid controversial Parliamentary election having claimed at least 160 lives and many injured is reflective of incumbent and opposition leaderships personal ambitions prioritized over national interest.
Bangladesh post independence in 1971 is yet to experience political stability along with economic and social developments especially among vast majority of struggling population.
Political systems premised on dynasty or hereditary accessions with other choice being candidacy exploiting relevant situation considering neither have addressed serious challenges confronting the nation during respective terms in office proves election a mere formality to legitimize authority.
Bangladesh ongoing turmoil emanating from the standoff between ruling government Awami League Party led by Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) under opposition leader Khaleda Zia evidently counterproductive.
Premier Sheikh Hasina administration authorized violent crackdown banning peaceful assembly and detention of political opponents in house arrest restricting movement conforms to appeasement of external sources using different nations as pawn to stir events in an attempt to create analogy for intended target viz. Thailand in the region despite the contrast in governance delineating latter from Bangladesh ruling authority.
However, the similarity between Thailand and Bangladesh opposition having served consecutively and failed to deliver on national issues except remaining focused in reclaiming power through party support instigating protests and general strike is also in adherence to foreign agenda causing political disturbance.
Unfortunately as a result of the current government and vying contenders self-centered aspirations in Bangladesh, the people are forced to bear economic losses and human toll increasing with government use of excess force and opposition determination to prolong turmoil in the state.
Instead the leaderships on both sides including other political factions outreach upholding constitution and democratic principles for national reconciliation setting aside differences would ease tensions and save lives from further confrontation.
The political consensus on common goals to revive republic rule with departure from power inheritance claiming entitlement and likewise plutocracy denying rest of the nation fair political representation is the viable option to end stalemate.
Bangladesh electorate predicament on two or multi party disposition to seize power and subsequent misuse of political mandate is an experience shared worldwide.
The breakthrough from such impasse perhaps possible with grassroots coalition forming political party with youth power emerging from disenfranchised and marginalized demography.
Since outside infiltration and their proxy rulers in the country stifle genuine popular front pledged to instrumental transformation in uplifting socio economic conditions and substitute with pseudo emulation to maintain status quo,
The requirement for new political groups beginning at local and national level is to disavow ties or affiliation with ruling class and political establishment to qualify as independent formidable force representing ordinary citizens across the spectrum in society.
National awakening rejecting politics espousing deception and betrayal of public trust due to foreign influence and domestic conventions could produce desirable outcome for the otherwise frustrated and disenchanted voters held hostage in the so-called democratic process.
Bangladesh could once again gain freedom from systemic abuse of power politics relieving nearly 100 million from generational subjugation and indebtedness towards meaningful existence with respect, dignity and prosperity for all.
Wishing striving Bangladesh citizens triumph in political, economic and social tribulation leaving behind traditional suppression of people power.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Lebanon – Terrorism And Political Assassination Target Statehood And Security
December 29, 2013
By Padmini Arhant
The continuous terror attacks, sectarian clashes and political assassinations in Lebanon targets statehood and security.
The chief sponsors of terrorism in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Egypt desire regional destabilization and ignore dire consequences directly affecting them.
Saudi Arabia and Israel joint efforts with United States and western allies coordination promoting volatility in Middle East is self-destructive expediting authoritarian regimes and facilitators imminent collapse.
When atrocities peak fomenting violence through terror exports and ammunitions supply killing innocent lives in war torn nations, the sources behind proxy wars are essentially seeking invitation for devastation upon them with irreversible outcome.
The detrimental strategy to decimate sovereign nations for specific agenda is evidently catastrophic due to malefic aspirations guiding irrationality.
Lebanon political leaderships indecisiveness and discord prevalent in non-cooperation with interim government preparation towards Presidential and Parliamentary election create opportunity for external powers to exploit situation.
The incidents involving violent assaults on Lebanese military forces and other events such as Tripoli unrest and bombings in Hezbollah domain,
Notwithstanding assassination of the resistance senior commander Hassan al-Lakkis past week and lately the political adviser to March 14 bloc Mohammad Shatah and shelling episodes in and around Beirut including sensitive territories in Lebanon and,
Last but not the least Israeli reconnaissance flights violating Lebanon sovereignty and recent annexation of Lebanon water fields and oil rich areas confirm Israel and Saudi Arabia manufactured crises for strategic dominance.
Political factions in Lebanon especially the March 14 alliance with Saudi dynasty influence on ex-premier Saad Hariri and members compromise Lebanon independence and endanger citizens as well as Lebanese army safety.
The March 14 political leadership and members are misled to maintain status quo and disillusionment on issues viz. assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri also the late father of current leader Saad Hariri necessary to purge Takfiri infiltration enabled by Saudi Arabia financing and Israel intelligence hiring local operatives to stir tensions and confrontation among Lebanese politic.
Hezbollah representing March 8 movement in solidarity with diverse political parties could lead the nation towards restoration of democracy and functioning government adept at overcoming challenges in all frontiers prioritizing national interest over respective convictions and ambition.
Lebanon strength lies in democratic process with political consensus on electoral reform and national issues varying from combating terror to implementing growth oriented economic policy.
Furthermore, Lebanon dealing with refugees influx from Syria, Palestine and Iraq might find effective solution in prohibiting weapons delivery and terror networks mobility across the border.
Besides providing humanitarian support to nations fighting foreign instigated turmoil could ease the burden on relevant governments.
Lebanon unity is constantly threatened with foreign intrusion in internal affairs aimed at disintegration and failed governance.
The population in Lebanon rejecting Saudi Arabia, Israel, United States and France…interference would delineate the country in exercising self-determination rights and defending territorial integrity.
Citizens urging political representatives to address national problems beginning with preventing widespread terror and constitutional adherence in forming republic choice government would guarantee Lebanon peace and stability.
With condolences to grieving families,
Best Wishes to people in Lebanon for a new beginning and promising future,
Happy New Year!
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
South Sudan – Internal Conflict With External Influence
December 18, 2013
By Padmini Arhant
The ongoing clashes among Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) rivals in Jonglei state capital Bor military camp resulting in 19 civilian casualties and an estimated 500 deaths along with 13,000 or more forced to flee the town is regrettable and those behind the violence bear responsibility.
Political disagreements cannot be resolved through innocent bloodshed and disputes are to be settled via communication and peaceful negotiations rather than targeting citizens of the country.
President Salva Kiir and opposition leader Riek Machar demonstrating leaderships by advising respective troops, political groups and loyalists to refrain from violent confrontations could restore relative calm and stability to the volatile situation.
Any major political differences and concerns over national issues like widespread corruption and economic problems exchanged in people assembly following appropriate procedures would be productive and perhaps lead to positive outcome sparing population and nation from spiraling turmoil.
The former deputy Riek Machar militarily challenging incumbent leader Salva Kiir evidently threatens national security not to mention the humanitarian suffering involving members of both ethnicity i.e. Nuer and Dinka representing the two leaders in the burgeoning crises.
South Sudan constant engagement in warfare deprives people the opportunity to experience freedom and the nation from economic growth despite the oil resources in possession.
Political ambitions to claim or remain in power do not guarantee self-satisfaction especially when the strategy is premised on undemocratic militaristic course with citizens forced to pay the price.
Moreover, such government formation would have difficulty winning public trust and confidence due to lack of credibility reflective in the means to accomplish goals.
The external influence in the conflict could not be ruled out conforming to the contemporary trend fomenting political chaos to facilitate weapons supply to all sides until eventual destabilization.
President Salva Kiir and opposition leader Riek Machar as well as SPLA commanders are urged to renounce fighting and instead return to civil discourse exemplifying sincere commitment to citizens safety and national interest.
The contenders vying for office could always prove eligibility utilizing the democratic process with electoral mandate confirming legitimacy unlike the prevalent measures to seize authority.
South Sudan leaderships and warring factions reconciliation is critical ending the internal unrest to maintain law and order with national defense force safeguarding territorial integrity and citizens safety.
President Salva Kiir administration and opposition leader Riek Machar collective efforts diffusing tensions in the troubled areas of the country could prevent escalation nationwide.
South Sudan cannot afford to evolve into Darfur and peaceful resolution is the only alternative to save the nation from civil war.
With condolences to bereaved families and prayers for the victims affected in the recent setbacks,
Wishing people in South Sudan peace and recovery from deteriorating political condition.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Mexico – PEMEX Privatization Against National Interest
December 17, 2013
By Padmini Arhant
Mexico Senate approval on oil reform bill inviting United States energy firms (Exxon Mobil and Chevron) to drill for crude has sparked citizens protests with petition bearing one million and six hundred thousand signatures against government action.
The largest oil company Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) under full state ownership up until now opened for private profit sharing after 75 years claiming the position as a requirement to boost production and revenue.
Mexico with substantial untapped reserves ranking second behind the Arctic Circle targeted in foreign monopoly influencing Mexican political system through neo liberal economic policy.
Since previous privatization in the late twentieth century led to exploitation and foreign companies excess control depriving the nation from due economic benefits, the people concern over repeat event in PEMEX deal is legitimate and deserves political diligence prior to proceeding with erroneous decision.
The proposal allowing energy companies to explore and extract oil and gas with investments to maximize capability in crude oil refinery and output to offset current 40% imports for domestic consumption might be the reason behind the ruling and opposition parties consensus on the contentious legislation.
However, PEMEX supporting the Mexican economy generating one-third national income could seek other possibilities to enhance productivity without compromising proprietary rights and profitability.
The lack of technology and funding being the two major factors attracting offshore partnership, these issues could be addressed with purchase of technology and hiring relevant expertise for training local workforce.
As for capital infusion, providing incentives to domestic investors and raising public shareholding could be the preliminary step towards protecting national assets and any additional financing supplemented with preference shares subscription offered to prospective international buyers safeguarding equity for continuous growth and development.
Besides government loans, the budget allocation to national enterprise PEMEX towards research and innovation for lucrative returns would deliver anticipated outcome in the economic perspective.
The state corporation compliance with safety ordinance, security measures and environment standards are paramount to sustain long term operation.
Mexico government pledge to climate treaty during COP 16 in Cancun exemplified in action with natural energy options viz. solar, wind and hydropower projects could cover inadequacy contemporarily necessitating overseas supply to meet national demand.
Subsequently adopting clean energy programs would be viable considering volatility in oil prices emanating from diverse unpredictable events.
Despite fuel abundance, Mexico reliance on external sources due to monetary and technological constraints could be overcome with appropriate adaptations while retaining state possession.
Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto heading the ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) and the opposition National Action Party (PAN) agreement ignoring overwhelming public rejection on this matter might contribute to political setbacks and economic liability following precedence.
The Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) solidarity with civil society against government plan is prudent given Mexico’s past economic losses from foreign acquisitions in the 1980’s and 1990’s proved unfavorable en masse.
Mexican lawmakers in the lower house exercising caution and careful evaluation of the law involving the last remaining national treasure with majority disapproval could prevent surrender of sovereignty and consequential subjugation in the voluntary liquidation.
Furthermore, Mexican legislators honoring republic will and decline authorization to the controversial PEMEX denationalization in consideration of pragmatic solutions would be promising for the country.
Hopefully reason and rationale would prevail in recognition of national pride reflective in PEMEX.
Good Luck to Mexican citizenry in defending national cause for prosperous future!
Wishing Mexico peaceful, progressive and phenomenal New Year and beyond.
Peace to all!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant