2010 Elections – The Balance of Power
September 6, 2010
By Padmini Arhant
With less than eight weeks for the mid-term elections, the speculations are the GOP will claim the House and the House majority leader will be John Boehner. Similarly, the speculators believe the GOP has a slim chance of taking over the U.S. Senate.
In view of the optimistic Republican forecast as potential majority House members it’s essential to review the GOP plans for the nation.
Currently, the GOP mantra is the economy they successfully transformed into near ‘Great Depression,’ during their majority rule in the House and Senate under the Republican administration of the former President George W. Bush and the Vice President Dick Cheney.
The Republicans might fervently argue that the Democrats controlled the House and the Senate since 2006.
Although it’s a valid argument, the Republican members always gain control over legislation regardless of them being the majority or the minority due to their allegiance to the special interests devising the bills in Capitol Hill.
Moreover, the former President George W. Bush vowed to veto the bills passed by the Congressional Democrats on every issue and the veto record exemplifies the oath.
Per the leading conservative talk show host complimenting on the previous Republican administration – “President George W. Bush was not the lame duck for the agendas were pushed against the Democrats will.”
The comment is accurate in that respect – prominently the Iraq war, financial deregulation, blank check to Wall Street and tax exemptions to the wealthy by letting the middle class America disappear with the lower income families in poverty were all the Republican achievements that drove the surplus economy into skyrocketing deficit mostly blown away in the illegal warfare.
The GOP economic plan is none and their winning strategy in the coming elections,
According to Wall Street Journal, September 2, 2010 – By David Wessel – Thank you.
“Republican rhetoric offers little help. To the quiet discomfort of a few GOP politicians and several who advise Republicans on economics, this year’s campaign, so far, has little of the substance that accompanied the 1994 Republican renaissance with then-House leader Newt Gingrich’s “Contract with America.
The only sure thing is that if President Barack Obama is for it, Republicans are against it.
Comments by Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell a few weeks ago are typical:
If a bill doesn’t kill jobs or make it harder to create them, they’re not interested. It’s time for a different approach.”
This may be smart politics. Why be specific and give the other side a target, when you’re winning by riding a wave of voter frustration: Don’t like the Obama economy? Vote for us.
The closest Republicans come to a public economic agenda are speeches by their House leader, John Boehner, who promises more detail later this month to blunt Democratic efforts to paint Republicans as the “Party of No.”
For now, a few themes are evident.
One is that the spending-heavy Obama is a failure, often extrapolated into arguing that government spending is inherently bad.
“The common logic among Washington Democrats is that government spending creates jobs when that money is used to build a hiking trail or a playground,” Mr. Boehner said, disapprovingly, during an Aug. 24 speech in Cleveland.
Adds GOP Rep. Paul Ryan: “We are not Keynesians. We don’t believe in demand-side stimulus. We’re going to stop the spending spree.”
That’s easier to promise than do. Even spending foes, once in office, tend to spend.
“Prior to the Democrats’ takeover of the Congress and the White House in 2008, the Republicans ushered in the largest expansion of federal spending since the heydays of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society in the 1960s,” says Alaska’s Joe Miller, who beat incumbent Sen. Lisa Murkowski in the Republican primary.
“You’re going to have a whole bunch of people coming here who aren’t going to want to vote for any spending bill—maybe defense? Maybe not?—to fund the government,” predicts Vin Weber, a former Republican congressman. That could force GOP leaders to rely on Democratic votes for spending bills to keep the government running, hardly a recipe for curbing spending.
The leadership’s avowed interest in promoting free-trade pacts, for instance, may not be shared by the populist Republicans who are winning primaries.
The absence of a coherent Republican agenda reflects more than the usual lack of consensus. The gap between current congressional leaders and tea-party activists is huge.”
——————————————————————————————————
GOP Economic Plan Overview – By Padmini Arhant
There is no economic plan upon Rep. John Boehner assuming House leadership and likewise in the Senate.
Except for extending the 2000 – 2008 President Bush and Vice President Cheney’s failed economic policy.
1. Renewing all the Bush tax cuts is a top GOP priority.
2. Business friendly tax cuts enabling massive Wall Street CEO Bonuses.
3. A big corporate tax overhaul that cuts rates now – Inevitably depriving revenue for the nation, besides widening the national deficit to an alarming proportion – precedence set by the Republican administration with unique expertise in this regard.
Ironically, it’s also the GOP’s main criticism against President Barack Obama even though the President has diligently set up bipartisan committee on deficit control.
4. Promoting free trade pacts – outsourcing 90% American jobs overseas enlarging the unemployment indefinitely and facilitating,
5. Small businesses, Retail and Wholesale industry collapse from the lack of consumer spending.
On the contrary, the Congressional House Democrats under the efficient and result oriented Speaker Nancy Pelosi passed the following legislation – swiftly and favorably to all Americans including the Small Businesses and Corporations to promote job growth.
Ref: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/d?d111:0:./list/bss/d111HR.lst:
1. H.R.1: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 – keeping 750,000 and more Americans employed with a significant rise in the immediate future upon complete investment.
2. H.R.2 : Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009
3. H.R.11: Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 – Guarantees equal pay for women that were denied by the Conservative Supreme Court votes followed by the Republican Senate coherence to the equal rights denial to women. The bill was passed through Democrats votes.
4. H.R.12: Paycheck Fairness Act – Subsequent to Republican Senate ‘Nay’ votes for equal pay to women, the matter was introduced through a new bill and passed with the Democrats votes.
5. H.R.13: TEACH for Our Future Act of 2009 – Focused on Higher Education, Lifelong Learning, and Competitiveness. Referred to the Subcommittee related to Higher Education…
6. H.R.14: Federal Ocean Acidification Research And Monitoring Act of 2009 – Referred to the House Committee on Science and Technology.
7. H.R.78: Stop Mortgage Fraud Act – Latest Major Action: 4/1/2009 House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee Hearings Held.
8. H.R.83: Homeowners Insurance Protection Act of 2009 – Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
9. H.R.84: Veterans Timely Access to Health Care Act – Latest Major Action: 3/25/2010 House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Subcommittee Hearings Held.
10. H.R.74: Financial Oversight Commission Act of 2009 – Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
11. H.R.58: Green Schools Act – Latest Major Action: 3/16/2009 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education.
12. . H.R.52: Tropical Forest and Coral Conservation Act – Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
13. H.R.49: American Energy Independence and Price Reduction Act – Latest Major Action: 2/4/2009 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
14. H.R.47: Expand and Preserve Home Ownership through Counseling Act – Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
15. H.R.46: Family Self-Sufficiency Act of 2009 – Latest Major Action: 4/30/2009 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
16. H.R.43: Medicare Access to Rehabilitation Services Act of 2009 – Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
17. H.R.21: Ocean Conservation, Education, and National Strategy for the 21st Century Act – Latest Major Action: 6/18/2009 House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Subcommittee Hearings Held.
18. H.R.16: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the deduction of State and local general sales taxes – Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
19. H.R.15: National Health Insurance Act – Latest Major Action: 1/6/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
20. Economic bills to stimulate job growth, Financial Reform, Health Care law, Unemployment Benefits extension and energy bill are the hallmark of Speaker Nancy Pelosi leadership.
Together with the extremely hardworking Democrat legislators alongside selective few Republican members votes made the historic legislation possible.
The choices are clear. American jobs, economy, education, health care, environment and energy independence are the Democrats priority.
Whereas the Republican leadership under John Boehner is clueless evidenced in the Wall Street Journal report and the minority leader’s interviews.
Why would the American electorate reject a bright future with Democrats under the leaderships of Speaker Nancy Pelosi in the House, Senate Democrats majority and President Barack Obama?
When they are all constantly engaged in improving American lives.
Quoting from the cited Wall Street Journal report –
“Many Republicans are running on “anger.” That may win the election; it’s hard to turn into a legislative agenda.”
Further, the Republican election winning strategy is to create a wedge between the solid Democrats working towards economic recovery and social progress. Usually it’s premised on distortion, false propaganda and negative attacks considering there is no specific economic or other proposals from them to move the nation forward.
GOP might have won in the past on divide and rule, polarization tactics. However, disregarding the reality on their track record that will be clarified and presented loud and clear to protect the American electorate from being misled in the coming weeks nearing election – is underestimating voter decision power.
After all, actions speak louder than rhetoric.
American voters’ prospects are assured under Democrats rule in the House, Senate and the White House.
The Republican action thus far has been protesting every legislation – particularly the jobs bill, economic revival such as unemployment extension, tax credits for consumer spending, payroll tax exemption to small businesses and corporations, $30 billion to community banks for small business lending…and,
Importantly they were against Wall Street reform and everything to do with national interest.
Republican candidates are hopeful in November 2010 to win the elections through their relentless support to Wall Street and the special interests’ campaign financing.
Unlike the Democrats accomplishments and future commitments towards American families and businesses that confirm their candidacy.
Please safeguard and secure your own, your family and the next generation’s prosperity by granting the Democrats a super majority status in the House and the Senate.
It’s well known that the Republican balance of power consistently produce “Washington gridlock,” – rewarding the special interests at the average American plight.
Allowing that to happen would be devastating for the national and global economy with slow and steady growth.
Notwithstanding history repeating itself reminiscent to 2000 – 2008 – President Bush and Vice President Cheney era.
Please visit the websites – www.dcccc.org, www.dscc.org. www.dnc.org and www.dga.org with your generous and affordable donations to help all Democratic contenders win the congressional election in November 2010.
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Democrat Candidate U.S.Senator Barbara Boxer – State of California
August 13, 2010
By Padmini Arhant
The California Senator is due for re-election in November 2010 after having diligently performed the constitutional duties in the best interests of the State of California, the United States and the international community at large.
Since 1992, Senator Barbara Boxer has served the Golden State and the great nation of the United States.
The Senator’s stellar record speaks volume about her dedication, ingenuity and above all conscientious decisions in matter related to the national and international interest.
Please refer to Senator Barbara Boxer’s extensive Public Service Record on;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Boxer
Senator Barbara Boxer is the incumbent –
Chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works,
In addition to serving as;
The Chairwoman of the Senate Select Committee on Ethics.
Both Committees are highly significant and Senator Barbara Boxer has impressively demonstrated her commitment to the environment as well as the ethics committee.
Senator Barbara Boxer is a distinguished Congress member and has consistently delivered for the average Americans who are often neglected in the special interests dominant legislative matter.
The Senator’s pragmatism has not only benefited her constituents in the State of California but also the entire nation.
Senator Barbara Boxer is a true representative of the democratic electorate having been the human rights stalwart aptly reflected in the various legislations.
Senator Barbara Boxer has risen to the occasion throughout her Congressional career to defend and promote the socio-economic status of all Americans especially the disenfranchised segments in the society.
While, the Senator has extended bipartisan support and worked across the aisle on important legislations,
She has not hesitated to challenge the fierce opposition against democrats’ policies aimed at improving American lives or national image.
Senator Barbara Boxer is a valuable asset to the Democratic Party, the esteemed Congress, the State of California and the United States.
People in the democratic base, the independents and others across the political spectrum are best served by the energetic, thoughtful and the doer democrat from California –
The Hon. Senator Barbara Boxer.
Senator Barbara Boxer’s opponent, the Republican candidate and a former Corporate Chief Executive Carly Fiorina is disproportionately funded by the special interests over and above the contestants’ personal campaign investment.
Considering the Republican members’ failure to prioritize American people over politics in all legislation,
The democrats have been forced to make huge concessions to win the odd Republican votes on major issues concerning the American electorate and the economy.
Prominently, the finance reform bill was recently passed with a $19 billion tax exemption to Wall Street for the Republican Senator Scott Brown’s vote in the Senate.
Campaign finance reform is compromised rendering the bill a mere formality and still without any
hope of being passed.
Evidently, it’s a battle to secure Republican members’ votes in the House and the Senate due to their solemn pledge to the special interests.
Your participation in the electoral process beginning now is extremely crucial for economic revival and to move the nation forward.
Please send any affordable or generous donations to re-elect the democrats like Senator Barbara Boxer, Governor Jerry Brown, and Congressional democratic contenders across the nation.
An overwhelming majority in the House and the Senate would enable the Democrat Congress members
succeed in effective representation.
Besides, better future for the American electorate.
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
P.S.: Please send your contributions to the following address or visit their websites.
www.barbaraboxer.com
Barbara Boxer
United States Senator
P.O.Box 93969
Los Angeles, CA 90093
DCCC – Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee www.dccc.org
Attn: Speaker Nancy Pelosi
430 South Capitol Street S.E.
Washington, D.C., 20003
DSCC – Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee www.dscc.org
Attn: State Senator (?)
120 Maryland Ave., N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20002.
DGA – Democratic Governors Association – www.democraticgovernors.org
1401 K Street, NW
Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005
Campaign Finance Reform Bill
August 8, 2010
By Padmini Arhant
Further to the United States Senate Actions Chronicle, there were more relevant bills proposed by the Senate Democrats in the past month – July 2010.
Campaign Finance Reform: The bill aimed at the election campaign’s fundamental problem – the special interests influence undermining democracy.
Evidently, it did not survive the Republican members opposition.
Although, the House passed the legislation, it failed in the Senate by three votes short of 60 votes required to eliminate Republican filibuster against the Disclose Act and various important components protecting the democratic sanctity.
The Democrats introduced the bill primarily to offset the negative effects from the Supreme Court’s decision granting unlimited access to the corporations, unions and other interests through campaign contributions, political ads and advocacy for or against any political candidate ahead of the election.
However, there was an exception to the Supreme Court’s rule that permitted Congress to legislate the interest groups’ political rhetoric via disclaimer and disclosure requirements.
Democrats precisely drafted the legislation to prohibit overseas corporations, federal contractors and tax payer bailed out businesses from the sponsorship.
At the same time, the bill enforced the disclaimer and disclosure requirement on the rest with the respective organizations’ chief executive or union leader’s personal appearance and endorsement message in the political ad.
Similar criteria apply to the nexus group representing the corporations, trade unions…to identify the top donors in the political ad.
Additionally, the corporations and advocacy groups are expected to provide campaign contribution details exceeding $1,000 in their political expenditure accounts.
The purpose behind this legislation is to enable transparency for free and fair elections by limiting the powerful organizations from depriving the electorates’ voice being heard in a democracy.
Not surprisingly, the business groups had expressed their grievances claiming the legislative act violated the free speech right and reportedly highlighted on the unions not being subject to the same conditions.
This issue could be addressed with a clear emphasis on the bill to affect all participants in the political campaign including the non-profit organizations with a political agenda regardless of stature.
Up until now, the legislation passage is entirely dependent on the democrats and isolated Republican member votes viz. Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, in all major issues.
The Republican opposition has been driven by the special interests controlling the electoral and legislative process.
Now, the Republican members voting against the campaign finance reform prove their priority to the business groups over their constituents and the American electorate in the nation.
In return, the business groups have pledged extraordinary support and financial backing to the Republican candidates thwarting the democrats’ effort to represent the American people and the nation at large.
Therefore, the public demand across the political spectrum is imperative to revive the bill and restore democracy upon the Congress members’ return from August recess.
Any resistance to the bill will indicate the political party and the member’s self-interest against national interest.
Rest assured, the Democrats bill on the campaign finance reform is a phenomenal step towards fixing the broken political system in Washington.
People have the power to bring about the long overdue change in the political sphere.
It’s possible by electing the legislators demonstrating their commitment to work for the people and the democrats are diligently performing their constitutional duties in improving American lives.
Please send your affordable / generous contributions to DCCC, DSCC, DNC and DGA in getting the doers i.e. the democrats elected overwhelmingly to the House, the Senate and State Governors in November 2010.
It might be a great challenge to compete with the corporations, but the will of the people cannot be deterred by the forces against them as established in 2008 elections.
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
P.S.: Please send your contributions to the following address or visit their websites.
DNC – Democratic National Committee – www.dnc.org
Attn: Governor Tim Kaine
430 South Capitol Street SE,
Washington, D.C., 20003
DCCC – Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee www.dccc.org
Attn: Speaker Nancy Pelosi
430 South Capitol Street S.E.
Washington, D.C., 20003
DSCC – Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee www.dscc.org
Attn: State Senator (?)
120 Maryland Ave., N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20002.
DGA – Democratic Governors Association – www.democraticgovernors.org
1401 K Street, NW
Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005
United States Senate Actions Chronicle
August 8, 2010
By Padmini Arhant
The United States Senate in the past week (August 2nd – August 6th 2010) made inroads through following actions.
1. Senate Confirmation of the Supreme Court Nominee.
Senate confirmed the Supreme Court Justice nominee, Elena Kagan and further enhanced the intellectual as well as the judicial acumen in the United States Supreme Court.
Congratulations! To the Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan for the highest honor and a lifetime opportunity to serve the people of the United States with objectivity, diligence in the interpretation of the constitutional law and decisions evaluated on the pervasive impact.
As stated earlier, Justice Elena Kagan would be a valuable asset to the present distinguished Supreme Court representation in all aspects.
Best Wishes to Justice Elena Kagan in the new judicial responsibility.
President Barack Obama and Congress members deserve credit in efficiently addressing the nomination process.
————————————————————————————————————————-
2. Senate Confirmation of the National Intelligence Director
Senate also confirmed the National Intelligence Director – James R. Clapper to lead the nation’s 16 intelligence agencies.
Recently, there were concerns regarding the fragmented intelligence apparatus and the revolving complexity compromising the efficiency required to serve national security.
The newly appointed Director is claimed to possess the credentials and experience in the intelligence field with glowing references from the defense and intelligence departments.
Director Clapper is expected to integrate the national intelligence efforts and provide the management crucial for national security.
It appears that Director Clapper successfully demonstrated his ability in this respect and convinced the Senate Committee for a unanimous vote during the confirmation hearing.
Congratulations and Best Wishes! To the National Intelligence Director – James R. Clapper in the important designation to safeguard national interests.
——————————————————————————————————————–
3. Senate Approval of $26 Billion for States and Schools
Earlier in the week, the Senate passed the bill to fund the States and School districts in an effort to protect the teachers and the several government workers’ jobs.
Teachers, law enforcement and emergency department employees were facing layoffs due to the states’ severe deficit crisis.
The federal aid is a saving grace for it would provide the school districts with timely financial supplement in maintaining the proper academic environment.
With respect to the states, the furloughs hurt the employees and deep spending cuts were targeted against the essential programs.
But, now the funding could help in those areas and prevent job losses that otherwise would have exacerbated the state and national unemployment.
The $26 billion is a stopgap measure to allow the states in continuing the necessary educational and social services including the border security provision by deploying 1000 patrol agents as a strike force in the sensitive areas.
The benefits are also extended to the department of Justice in handling the excess case overload.
It’s noteworthy that the bill is entirely funded by the revenue from closing the business tax loophole and making spending cuts.
Therefore, it does not add to the national deficit.
The $600 million appropriated towards border security is also paid for. The 10 percent increase in spending is adjusted against the visa application fee hikes on the few companies sponsoring foreign workers.
Senate action is praiseworthy and reflects the authors such as the New York Senator Charles E. Schumer as well as others’ true commitment in defending the nation from economic woes and security foes.
House of Representatives are returning to vote on this bill next week. It’s indicative of their dedication to rescue the vulnerable members in the society. Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the House members’ action are attention worthy.
The public gratitude in this regard would be inevitably conveyed through ballots in November 2010.
Republican Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe share the appreciation for their bipartisan support in the recent legislations.
Perhaps, other Republican members would join their two esteemed colleagues in the near future.
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
National and International Issues Overview
July 30, 2010
By Padmini Arhant
1. National economic situation: The stimulus package passed in early 2009 undoubtedly salvaged the economy from the brink of collapse.
However, need to work on policies to produce quick results in job growth and economic recovery. The legislative actions are encouraging and the public satisfaction is dependent upon their experience in job search and security as well as the overall economy.
The Democrats’ determination and diligence in passing several life- saving legislations deserve attention and re-election in November 2010.
Congratulations! To President Barack Obama, the Democratic Congress and the three Republican members on the financial regulations. Continuous monitoring to improve the housing market and the credit crunch would expedite the economic revival.
2. National Health care reform: Health care reform is historic and will be beneficial to the millions uninsured upon the legislative measures being effective in 2014 and 2019 respectively.
Meanwhile, the average Americans are still hurting especially the patients with pre-existing illnesses are currently denied medical access.
The year 2014 might appear around the corner but not to the people battling with life and death as they desperately seek immediate health care.
Interim health care assistance through legislative enhancements and pressuring health insurers to refrain from health coverage denial including the premium hikes in particular is quintessential to gain public acknowledgment.
The nomination of “Health Care Director,” to oversee Medicare and other federal health care programs is a sound approach to the status quo anomalies.
3. Energy Policy: The legislation in motion for review and debate is a monumental challenge considering the energy industry lobbying power.
As highlighted earlier, the offshore drilling is a proven disaster. Focus on clean renewable energy sources away from fossil fuel and nuclear energy to avoid not only environmental catastrophes but also restraining the nuclear proliferation is the only viable option for energy independence and environmental protection.
4. Immigration: Passing the immigration bill with amnesty for the estimated 12 million immigrants in the country besides strict border patrol to curb drug and arms trade is no longer an option but a necessity.
5. Education: Federal Grants and state funding are impressive in promoting quality education to prepare the American workforce for the competitive global economy. Again, the reality is not reflective of the generous provisions as the school districts struggle to maintain the regular academic standard. Therefore, oversight in the appropriate use of federal funds is vital.
6. Improving Race Relations: The recent legislation by Congress against the discriminatory rule in drugs and substance abuse among different racial groups is a progressive change.
Similarly, it should be extended to the abuses in the court rooms towards the ethnic groups that are simply not a matter of discussion or concern, since racial prejudice is presumed to affect only the prominent minorities.
The inherently flawed legal decisions due to judicial authorities’ predisposition against the ethnic members suggest the lack of diversity in the judiciary to serve the overwhelming immigrant population with fairness at the state and national level.
Contrarily, dispute resolutions and Ombuds Programs by the county are highly recommended as the first choice because of its excellent merits such as the individuals’ objectivity, patience and listening skills.
The free service is offered by professionals who volunteer to help the community on a range of issues. The mediators offering their valuable time to help society in itself speaks volume about their commitment and dedication to serve in the best interests of both parties. They are reasonable and result oriented apart from saving costs for everyone involved.
7. Foreign Policy: Tremendous input through peaceful negotiations and diplomacy is a priority in resolving disputes. The President’s efforts in the beginning following the inauguration raised international hope. Then understandably the administration time is largely devoted towards national issues.
Nevertheless, the major international on-going conflicts require momentum viz. Israeli Palestinian peace process not barring freedom for Tibet, Burma, Iran, North Korea…enduring oppression and persecution.
A. United Nations Security Council expansion is paramount in dealing with global crisis. As suggested earlier, the present U.N. Security Council permanent membership is inadequate and do not reflect the twenty first century economic, political and social environment.
B. Allowing neutral global partners like Japan, Brazil, India, Germany, South Africa, Turkey and United Arab Emirates with veto power would fairly represent the multidimensional world in solving the deepening regional problems.
8. Afghanistan: Preparation for troop withdrawal and deploying forces to improve Afghan lives in addition to empowering them to form an efficient government is urgently desirable at the national and international front.
9. Iraq Responsibility: Adhering to the U.S and Iraq time line withdrawal would ease the economic burden on the U.S. taxpayers.
At the same time, pressuring the Iraqi government led by Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki to honor the democratic mandate in the March 2010 elections by allowing the secular political power with the Shiite leader Ayad Allawi is critical in addressing the political stalemate. It’s a serious national security crisis for Iraq while the U.S and allies are faced with an economic liability from it.
Political stability and not U.S. military presence is the response to the Iraqi quagmire.
Unequivocally, U.S. withdrawals from Afghanistan and Iraq would contribute to national deficit reduction.
10. Job creation, housing market and the economy are imperative for most Americans.
Finally, despite vigorous opposition the legislative achievements by the Democratic Congress members in the House and the Senate and President Barack Obama’s administration are phenomenal.
Evidently, the law makers instrumental in the successful legislation have earned re-election opportunity in November 2010 to lead the nation towards prosperity.
Good Luck! to President Barack Obama and the Congress members in their future endeavors.
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Response to Governor Tim Kaine
July 27, 2010
Hon. Gov. Tim Kaine
DNC Chairman
Washington D.C.
Dear Governor Kaine,
Thank you for your letter.
The responses to the requests were promptly sent by priority mail with return receipts and I’ve the delivery confirmation for all of them.
Perhaps, the delay could be at the mail distribution within the headquarters or at the White House and advising them to forward the urgent deliveries to the concerned parties without any delay would be helpful.
However, I’m sending you the information again for the President’s personal attention.
Hopefully, there will be no confusion this time.
Sincerely,
Padmini Arhant
Celebrating Fourth of July – Independence Day
July 4, 2010
By Padmini Arhant
July 4th is a glorious occasion for all Americans. On this day, the native and the naturalized citizens come together to cherish the individual freedom that still remains a far-fetched dream for many around the world.
Independence Day is an opportunity to commemorate the nation’s birthday. It honors the founding fathers’ wisdom, resolve and vision for the country they pledged to serve not only during their lifetime, but also beyond the foreseeable future.
“All are created equal and born to be free,” – the natural law has been discarded by human race since evolution and the dominance of some over others is exercised as an “entitlement.”
Liberty is an inalienable right of every life on earth. Yet, freedom is seized from the weak and forced to pay a price through sacrifice and prolonged struggle to regain the fundamental right.
For the unfortunate, the oppression continues without a ray of hope in the lifelong battle that spans over generations.
The minority that controls the majority justify their actions through various interpretations, despite the evidence proving otherwise.
The complacency to the territorial annexation, occupying lands for economic benefits and denying equality to fellow human beings has promoted injustice against the vulnerable population resigned to the reality as the destiny.
Throughout history, human behavior is consistent in the invasion, occupation, persecution and annihilation in the extreme events. From Stone Age to Digital Era, the pattern is maintained with the variation in imperialism evolved into totalitarianism.
United States and other nations’ contribution in restoring sovereignty during the twentieth century world wars is significant and saved humanity from tyranny.
Subsequently, such involvements have yielded unsavory results due to the mission lacking in clarity and purpose.
The courageous troops in harm’s way diligently serve the nation to protect the freedom rejoiced by the people on this Independence Day. They are always in our thoughts and prayers.
Human suffering is brought upon by excess greed for wealth and power. It has led to perpetual warfare with serious economic and political ramifications.
Regardless of the tremendous human progress, peace is not an overwhelming choice in resolving disputes.
Aggression and violence precedes diplomacy and peaceful measures indicating the lack of patience.
Defense spending consuming the major proportion of the budget is given priority and the society’s economic needs rejected on the ‘national debt’ criteria.
United States was envied for being the model democracy and lately the civil liberties has been compromised under “FISA and Patriot Act,” with wiretapping, monitoring private communication, NSA warrantless surveillance…rendering freedom a privilege at the authority’s discretion.
Global security is threatened by terror. Terrorism is a revenge for the bad elements.
Sadly, the groups are emboldened by the failed policies of the corrupt political powers depriving the local population from the economic and political freedom to live and thrive in their domain.
Terror recruitments would decline sharply, if the people in the impoverished regions have access to necessities such as clean drinking water, health and education, agriculture and industrial growth at the least.
Instead, the economic and political powers have maximized military intervention with minimal or zero investments in the social and economic development, transforming the environment into a war zone for a decade and longer from Vietnam to Iraq and Afghanistan.
Freedom is the natural gift for the living.
History is testimony to the fact that none shall ever remain in eternal foreign rule.
The declaration of independence by the United States on July 4, 1776 followed by several other nations exemplifies the inevitable success to the oppressed.
Happy Fourth of July!
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Supreme Court Nominee – Solicitor General Elena Kagan
July 1, 2010
By Padmini Arhant
The Senate Judiciary Committee hearing to confirm the Supreme Court Nominee – Solicitor General Elena Kagan is in process.
Solicitor General Elena Kagan upon confirmation would succeed the retired Supreme Court Justice, John Paul Stevens to the United States Supreme Court.
Notably, the appointment would strengthen the female representation to one-third on the current bench.
While it still remains a minority. it’s a significant social progress made in recent years to the highest court on land.
President Barack Obama’s commitment in this respect is praiseworthy.
Since the hearing commencement, the Solicitor General Elena Kagan has responded patiently and diligently to most if not all of the issues raised by the distinguished panel.
The Solicitor General’s disposition conforms to the previous appointees for similar position.
Therefore, it’s not unprecedented in the Senate confirmation hearing.
Although, departure from such tradition would benefit public confidence in the potential lifetime appointee entrusted with judicial duty on life and death matter.
The Senate members posed many important issues to ascertain the nominee’s position. Some were politically motivated and the majority relevant to the cause.
Solicitor General Elena Kagan’s background and credentials has been under scrutiny from the early introduction to until now.
The Supreme Court nominee is profiled for better understanding and in some instances caricatured to place the aspirant in spotlight depending on the critics’ “ethical” standard.
Solicitor General Elena Kagan stellar academic and career achievements have rightfully earned the recognition leading up to the Supreme Court nomination.
The buzz about the nominee from the beginning was her lack of experience in the capacity as a ‘Judge,’ despite the precedence set by the Supreme Court predecessors, the latest being the former Justice William Rehnquist nominated by the Republican President Ronald Reagan.
During the Senate hearing, the nominee, Elena Kagan had to address diverse issues ranging from:
The executive power, Congressional deference, corporate influence, political activism – a common attribute towards the democratic nominee by the opposition, past incidents linked to,
The military recruitment on college campus including clarification on personal statements and memos to determine adaptability to the existing judicial view.
Solicitor General Elena Kagan maintained throughout the session that she would strictly adhere to the Constitutional law and not attempt to interpret it differently for political or any other reason.
Further, the Solicitor General elaborated on personal humility and pledged to respect the precedential settings on historic hearings notwithstanding the Supreme Court recent ruling safeguarding the second amendment.
In addition, some Senate members sought assurance from the nominee on the denial of Habeas Corpus to detained terror suspects apprehended from civil or combat environment.
The nominee in agreement with “battlefield law, including indefinite detention without a trial, could apply outside of traditional battlefields.”
International law was extensively discussed against the Constitutional law to establish the nominee’s priority pertaining to the academic period as the “Dean at Harvard Law School.”
In other controversial social issues such as abortion, gay military personnel and the “Don’t ask, don’t tell,” policy, the Solicitor General confirmed the published views.
Protecting women’s health and highlighting the drawbacks from depriving the gay members to serve the nation on equal basis.
However, in the related subjects the nominee Elena Kagan reportedly stated the following:
Source: Wikipedia.org – Elena Kagan
“ 1. From 1995 to 1999, Kagan served as President Bill Clinton’s Associate White House Counsel and Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council.
While serving in that position, Kagan co-authored a May 13, 1997 memo to the President urging him to support a ban on late-term abortions stating that, “We recommend that you endorse the Daschle amendment in order to sustain your credibility on HR 1122 and prevent Congress from overriding your veto.”
2. In 1996, she wrote an article in the University of Chicago Law Review entitled, “Private Speech, Public Purpose:
The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine.” Kagan argued that government has the right, even considering the First Amendment, to restrict free speech, when the government believes the speech is “harmful”, as long as the restriction is done with good intentions.
3. During her solicitor general confirmation hearing, she said that “there is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage.”
Also during her solicitor general confirmation, Kagan was asked about the Defense of Marriage Act, under which states don’t have to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. She said she would defend the act.”
In due fairness to the nominee’s statements, the approach to defend the constitution is a primary judicial responsibility.
At the same time, if exercising empathy in the decision-making is characterized as ‘social activism,’ then similar considerations to the authorities in the executive and legislative branches not barring the corporations exceed the judicial power granted within the confines of the law.
Unfortunately, it’s a growing trend hindering justice particularly on ethical misconduct in the democratic system.
Again, the Solicitor General perceptions on the basic human rights – women’s health, freedom of expression superseding the second amendment in the Bill of Rights, and gay rights is lacking in candor consequentially the clarity on the fundamental law that –
“All are created equal and hence qualify for the equal application of law.”
Social injustice based on race, religion, sexual orientation, gender discrimination, economic status…are explicitly prevalent given the human progress in other tangible fields.
The political, economic and religious institutions intrusion in justice has the ‘average’ human life hanging in balance with the hope that justice is served by taking into account,
Obedience to the law as well as the facts and evidences authenticated by the conscionable action to be impartial.
Solicitor General Elena Kagan is regarded for her intellect, consensus building, hard work and thoughtfulness, the valuable assets that would not only contribute to the enriched Supreme Court representation, but also empower the nation’s highest court with additional perspective.
If confirmed, Solicitor General Elena Kagan would have the opportunity to be a superb Supreme Court Justice.
Best Wishes to the Solicitor General Elena Kagan in all her endeavors.
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Remembering Senator Robert Byrd – Democrat Senator, West Virginia
June 28, 2010
By Padmini Arhant
Today, the United States Senate and the nation lost a longest serving Senator and the member in congressional history.
Senator Robert Carlyle Byrd, a Democrat from the state of West Virginia, political career span from January 2, 1959 – June 28, 2010.
Reflecting on the record, the Senator had previously struggled to keep pace with the social developments in the society.
Nevertheless, towards the end there appears to be some reconciliation with the erroneous decisions the Senator had made during his term in office.
No human being is infallible. Those who recognize the missed opportunities to contribute to positive changes and later do it right are honorable.
For the recent contributions benefiting all forms of life represents the core value, a confirmation of the fact that it’s never too late to act for greater good.
Senator Byrd has served the West Virginia constituents well. Otherwise it would have not been possible to hold the historic position in the Senate.
The democrats and other Congress members reminisced their time with the Senator from West Virginia.
Senator Robert Byrd’s unprecedented public service to the citizens in West Virginia and across the nation remembered with respect and gratitude.
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant
Shades of Contemporary Politics
May 24, 2010
By Padmini Arhant
The last week Primary and Special elections in the United States delivered bittersweet outcome for both political parties.
Pennsylvania election results were particularly unique with the Democratic Primary nomination for the U.S. Senate seat won by a less known candidate, Joe Sestak against the long time Senator Arlen Specter and Democrat Mark Critz victory over Republican contender, Tim Burns to retain the deceased Rep. John Murtha’s seat in the House for the blue team.
Likewise, Kentucky picked the tea party favored candidate Rand Paul, while Arkansas led the incumbent to a run off in the respective primaries.
Although, there were insinuations attributed to political endorsements or the lack thereof for the losses in the elections, conventional wisdom beckons optimistic perspective and accept the mandate as a blessing in disguise for the electorates’ decision is based on their evaluation of the candidates’ profile in the race.
External intervention by embellishing the contenders’ or exaggerating the opponents’ performance seen during elections is an insult to the electorates’ intelligence with an inevitable backlash.
It’s always convenient to scapegoat others for failures by ignoring the fact that the candidates contesting on their own merit combined with a track record pledged to serve the people and not the special interests or political factions emerged winners.
Regardless of the establishment backing and high power recommendation, the electorates cast their ballots to fresh ideas and a serious commitment to resolve issues concerning them.
Despite the relentless propaganda and spinning in the communication media – airwaves, television and print press, the electorates are increasingly aware of the broken political system, due to its impact in their daily life.
In fact, contemporary politics is gradually leading the mass towards self-governance through discernment in their choice of representatives as a stark reminder to the elected officials to live up to their campaign promise or deal with the consequences.
At the same time, revealing to the special interests that ultimately the people are the authentic authority in a democracy.
It’s the beginning of the end of era where voters’ voice is unheard in the persistent negative attacks and swift boating financed by the special interests and largely some news media including the press to launch their designee from either political party.
The political process is being redefined by the smart electorates determined to take the power back where it belongs in a democracy – the government of the people, by the people and for the people.
Congratulations! To the winners and Good Luck! To the other participants in all their endeavors.
Thank you.
Padmini Arhant